Topalov Tops Ranking List

Submitted by SonofPearl on Sun, 09/14/2008 at 1:19am.

As the dust settles in Bilbao at the end of the Grand Slam Final, the former FIDE World Champion, Veselin Topalov (pictured) has emerged at the top of the live ranking list.  It's incredibly tight at the top - before Ivanchuk's last round loss to Topalov, HE was number 1.  No more major tournaments are due before the official list is published on 1 October, so it looks like Topalov will be the new official number 1.

The full results in the final round were:

Topalov, Veselin - Ivanchuk, Vassily 1-0 43 D47 Queens Gambit Meran
Aronian, Levon - Radjabov, Teimour 0-1 49 A15 English counter King's Fianchetto
Carlsen, Magnus - Anand, Viswanathan ½-½ 29 D13 Slav Exchange


Anand equalised quickly against Carlsen's strange choice of the Exchange Slav, and a draw soon resulted.  Aronian had a strong position against Radjabov but blew it to hand Radjabov his only win of the tournament.

The final standings:

Players Games Win Draw  Loss POINTS
Veselin Topalov 10 4 5 1 17
Magnus Carlsen 10 3 4 3
13
Levon Aronian 10 3 4 3 13
Vassily Ivanchuk 10 2 6 2 12
Teimour Radjabov 10 1 7 2 10
Viswanathan Anand 10 0 8 2 8


Carlsen finishes second ahead of Aronian by virtue of beating him 2-0 in their head-to-head games.  Carlsen should be pleased with his performance - he fought hard and it's difficult to believe he is still only 17 years of age.

Aronian blew hot and cold but overall achieved a respectable result.  His two losses to Carlsen proved very costly.

Ivanchuk's play wasn't helped by the fact that the time control for the tournament did not include a per-move increment; something he actually forgot entirely in the first round and was lucky that a sporting and gracious Anand agreed to a draw.  At 39 years of age, Chucky is as brilliant and infuriating as ever.  If he could find a way to cure his nerves and time-trouble addiction then he could still yet be the World Champion.

What to say about the current World Champion, Vishy Anand?  Even if this tournament was simply a warm-up for his world championship match in October against Kramnik, it's a hugely disappointing result.  No wins, and not much fight in his play either.  He may have been trying to avoid revealing his opening preparation, but that doesn't explain his insipid play in the other phases of the game.

Let's hope that both Anand and Kramnik will show their true abilities in their match and provide some memorable games and a great contest worthy of the title.

 

Comments:

by ronald - 14 months ago
Philippines
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 38

i think the better move.31. knfxBf6 Aronian vs Radjabov i think white could win chances are they had discover check and the result it could be a possible winning.Wink

by Smartattack - 14 months ago
Portugal
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 871

It s GM Wang Yue.

by jaronkovich - 14 months ago
qld Australia
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 416

Great games,thank you

by catfishcore - 14 months ago
Warren, Ohio United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 40

The winner of the Grand Prix series was suppose to qualify for something. Does anyone know how all this links to a shot at the championship. Does anyone know who is the over all points leader in this years Grand Prix?

by martinwalker - 14 months ago
Wembley England
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 8

Could Aronian have won with 45. Rbe1?  After 45.....Rxb 46. Rxe8+ Kc7 47. R8e3 (or 47. Qh7+ Kb6 48. c5+ dc 49. Bxb3 Rf2+ 50. Kg1 Qf3 51. Bd5 Rg2+! 52. Kh1 cxd5 and I can't see a way for white to prevent mate)47.....Rb2+ 48. Kg1 Rf1+ 49. Rxf1 Qd2 50. c5+ Kxc! again I don't see how mate can be prevented.  The question is, what happens after 47. Ne3?  What do readers think?  And if black wins in all these lines, where did Aronian go wrong?

by BrunoMiguel - 14 months ago
St Bruno Canada
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 5

hello m8s

i think the new scoring is good but a bit despenalizing to the loss, so i think the scores should be win-2.5 and draw-1.

as you can see the final result would be the same but a bit more tight, the players with more number of losses would be more near of ivanchuk with less losses, but it could change the classification ( check 9 round ) and i think it would be more fair because a defeat in chess is not good and is quite different from a draw.

regards

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.