Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!
LATITUDE's Albums

For our friends in Texas

  • by LATITUDE
  • | Jan 24, 2008
  • | 429 views
  • | 0 comments

In his Critique of Pure Reason, Kant described space as an a priori intuition that (together with another a priori intuition, time) allows us to comprehend sensual experience. Kant referred to such intuitions as noumena and as things in themselves. In Kant's view, neither space nor time are conceived of as substances, but rather both are elements of a systematic framework we use to structure our experience. Spatial measurements are used to quantify how far apart objects are, and temporal measurements are used to quantify how far apart events occur. However, these measurements are applied by our minds to categorize what we sense and are not an inherent part of the thing in itself.

Schopenhauer, in the preface to his On the Will in Nature, stated that "space is the condition of the possibility of juxtaposition." This is in accordance with Kant's understanding of space as a form in the mind of an observing subject.

Similar philosophical questions concerning space include: Is space absolute or purely relational? Does space have one correct geometry, or is the geometry of space just a convention? Historical positions in these debates have been taken by Isaac Newton (space is absolute), Gottfried Leibniz (space is relational), and Henri Poincaré (spatial geometry is a convention). Two important thought-experiments connected with these questions are: Newton's bucket argument and Poincaré's sphere-world. FROM THE WIKI


  • 12 views | 0 comments

  • 12 views | 0 comments

  • 6 views | 0 comments

  • 8 views | 0 comments

  • 12 views | 0 comments

  • 9 views | 0 comments

  • 7 views | 0 comments

  • 8 views | 0 comments

  • 10 views | 0 comments

  • 9 views | 0 comments

  • 8 views | 0 comments

  • 6 views | 0 comments


Back to Top

Post your reply: