this is like asking a mall shopper what paris fashion style they try to dress as.

"Autistic" (Ret - sue me :))

My style changes depending on the game. As any great players should, to have a certain stye of play no matter the condition is predictible, and anyone who figures your "modus operandi" out, can easily find holes in your style if you play the same everytime, and holes equal a loss.. Simple and plain. So my style changes or evolves with each win OR loss, learn from both wins and losses. Adapt, adapting means greatness, don't lose the same way twice. But if I was forced to choose I guess my overall style of play is classified as Attacking, because I will see a hole or opening and exploit your mistakes and make you pay, and attack without regard for piece loss, hey offense is the best defense, but hey it's a gift and a curse.

Haphazardly with occasions of good luck? Oops, not an option.

Oportunist.

I think the concept a that anyone under 2200  has a style of play is most silly and pretentious.

 

Even at highest levels, no one can force a style on another player.

I don't know. How can I know this? Maybe I can some direction to work towards!

Mine is Calculating. 

oh this is a good one, well since they claiming to be geniuses then my style must be all tricks, so tricky of course.

"I've always believed that playing "conservative" "defensive" "drawish" chess is inherently inferior to playing the best move you can in any given situation"

I guess Petrosian was world champion for 6 years because his moves were inferior.

I said dynamic, because you never know if my next move is going to be brilliant or a blunder...

i think all of these are closely related but ones move should be logical this will increase day by day when u play and finaly u will become agood player

What about "either I pwn my opponent with mad skills or my opponent pwns me with mad skills"

I guess the word that called out most to me is "dynamic"

I've always believed that playing "conservative" "defensive" "drawish" chess is inherently inferior to playing the best move you can in any given situation, if your playing style doesn't involve you making the moves that give you the best shot of winning, you should reevaluate your playing style. I typically place positional advantages in front of material ones; if you aren't on the offensive, you aren't winning.

Dynamic, at least I try to play like that ...

Style is an illusion.

All of them, the best games I play involve most if not all styles, used by both opponents.

Intuitive, even though my instinct sometimes fails me.

I' m more tactical .

You left out "bumbling."  That's me.