One can only vote for one option so my choice was "negative influence". Quick chess does help in time scramble - you keep your nerve. I also use not quick chess so much - but no-increment blitz - to get a feel for opening lines that i am considering playing seriously in the future.
But on the whole, I do think it has a negative influence on my chess. Yet since I took up chess again in 2006, I play blitz and quick much more than "proper" chess. Human beings are not *that* logical - nor should they be imo;)
It's hard to say, but I know that I play much WORSE in quick games. On chess.com, my rating has climbed significantly in the last few months, but I think it's a bit deceptive. In openings, I make a lot of moves based on databases instead of using my head. Later in the game, I have all the time I need to calculate variations and figure out which moves are really bad.
Obviously, it's exactly the opposite in quick chess...what I really need to improve in chess is to play some real, traditional OTB tournaments. But meanwhile, I think playing both fast chess and ultra-slow (correspondence) chess will help me balance out my game...
for me it's negative, though I like to play fast.
That's the problem, I'm not calculating in correspondence chess at all anymore, just playing on intuition
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.