^ Click here to remove ads! ^

I think quick chess...

Created on Sun, 05/11/2008.

I think quick chess...

| view results

Comments:

by Gokukid - 53 days ago
Dasmarinas Philippines
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 189
I don't like compromising the quality of the game.
by Pecopteris - 2 months ago
Michigan United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 15
I think it is fun, but not a very beneficial tool.
by damourax - 2 months ago
Juiz de Fora - MG Brazil
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 75
It's nice to practice some openings. But it can harm your game! ;)
by normajeanyates - 2 months ago
london [often in calcutta india] International
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 1146

One can only vote for one option so my choice was "negative influence". Quick chess does help in time scramble - you keep your nerve. I also use not quick chess so much - but no-increment blitz - to get a feel for opening lines that i am considering playing seriously in the future.

But on the whole, I do think it has a negative influence on my chess. Yet since I took up chess again in 2006, I play blitz and quick much more than "proper" chess. Human beings are not *that* logical - nor should they be imo;)


by Fellippo - 2 months ago
Zlín Czech Republic
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 486
Just fun, I consider quick chess to be only matter of time.
by Amnesiac - 2 months ago
Devon United Kingdom
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 393
Its got to be mainly negative although it does have a couple of positives. It prepares you too keep composure when low on time over-the-board and shows just how important inititive is as if you have alot in quick chess you tend to win.
by God2 - 2 months ago
Malaysia
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 1082
best way to prove "the honest player in online"
by epheterson - 2 months ago
Gainesville, FL United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 19
My first checkmate was a two hour game. Since, I've realized that taking my time and fully analyzing my options is the best way to win a game. When I rush I sometimes do poorly. 
by armiller - 2 months ago
Southern California United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 126

It's hard to say, but I know that I play much WORSE in quick games. On chess.com, my rating has climbed significantly in the last few months, but I think it's a bit deceptive. In openings, I make a lot of moves based on databases instead of using my head. Later in the game, I have all the time I need to calculate variations and figure out which moves are really bad.

 

Obviously, it's exactly the opposite in quick chess...what I really need to improve in chess is to play some real, traditional OTB tournaments. But meanwhile, I think playing both fast chess and ultra-slow (correspondence) chess will help me balance out my game... 


by bastiaan - 2 months ago
eindhoven Netherlands
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 368

for me it's negative, though I like to play fast.

That's the problem, I'm not calculating in correspondence chess at all anymore, just playing on intuition


by Dmytro - 2 months ago
Kiev Ukraine
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 187
I think it have rather positive influence because you can define what problems you have: opening/endgame theory (quick chess is great indicator of automatic play in know positions for you), you blunder often or don't see winning moves, also quick chess is a good tool to "warm" before serious competitions and, of course, it's fun.
by rich - 2 months ago
England
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 6740
I actually think it's negative influence.

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.