9671 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Created on November 1, 2011 |
6742 Votes | 101 Comments
live chess standard tournaments are the closest thing to actual OTB tournaments as played in regular chess clubs or USCF or FIDE official chess tournaments. That is why I would like to have some of them here in chess.com, which, by all other standards, is the best chest site I have encountered... and that is coming from one with many premium memberships on other sites such as Gameknot, ICC and others. And... while we are on the subject on standard tourneys online, while ICC does have some, I have found it very cumbersome to register or participate in them with ridiculous codes to enter to join and very impractical times often.... I am posting all this to encourage chess.com to have standard tournaments.
I would much rather play a tournament with a longer time control such as at least 30 minutes each or more :) I like to think.
I was doing something else then what i voted for but i love Lightning rounds!
I think a time control of, say 1|15 (roughly 20 seconds a move) as a fixed time per move gives you time to think while the game doesn't take too long (less than 25 minutes).
Yes I support Mr. Chigorin's proposal for a G120 time control like ICC with one game per week. That would give people who like slow time controls a lot of happiness. Also, I noticed its quite hard to get a 15 10 going, because of lack of people. But if as in other sites, you schedule a time of day for the 15 10, perhaps more slow time control chess players will queue up or collect for that time. Example on another site, there's a 15 0 four round tournament at 10 am and 10 pm eastern time, each day, and you get about eight to ten people showing up for that everyday.
A G-120 tourament with one game per week over 4 weeks, (like on ICC) would be lovely. I would even upgrade again for that.
May be better to move this survey to the actual live chess page. Many of the live chess people don't view the front page to the responses may be a little skewed.
I like to play the 5 minute blitz and lightning, because the 15 w/ ten second delay is almost like competeing in a real tournament, and putting a few hours into it
I'd probably play 1 | 0 lightning the most because it takes the fastest time to get started.
ya, there should be some prizes, even if it is just an increase in the rating of the player!
10/0 Rapid, 5/0 Blitz, and 3/0 Super Blitz.
4|7 is the best for me - 7 secs can be enough to think a good move when your time nearly over, (so you'll never lose with the time) and the whole game will result 10/12 mins long
wiil these games be rated?
@Bigalex The problem with prizes for winning is that it strongly encourages cheating and/or sandbagging. Chess.com would have to up its cheat detection for something like that, and even then only the very very top players would ever win any, or else it would be divded by rating and only the people who sank their rating beforehand to get free membership would win. =/
@shon615 - Two days ago! :D
When's it coming???for the free members??
can't wait for it~~!!!!~~
no love for bullet chess eh guys? I think people will end up playing 1|0 more often than they think just because they're quick.
Although I enjoy playing fast time controls, I am also fond of a long time controls like 60 0 for instance (one round a day or a week). I play tournaments like this frequently in another server. I play every tuesday (4 rounds a month).
Another thing you guys should consider is giving away short memberships to the winners of specific tournaments. Something like 1 month for the winner, 2 weeks for the 2nd and 1 week for the 3rd. This would compell people to join and also would serve as a degustation for a longer membership.
What do you think?
Yes, Firefalcon - observing is on the roadmap, just not a fixed point at this moment.
4 days ago
11 days ago
2 weeks ago
3 weeks ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!