17187 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Created on June 19, 2011 |
9550 Votes | 182 Comments
for me i believe my weak point is openings,i need a wider variety of openings,and better tactics,a game can be won or loss predicated on a bad opening
positional play...i dont even know what that means :D
For me it's openings. The problem is mostly the idea behind some (or many) variations of my favorite openings. Simply put: How to transit from the opening into a decent middle game, that's my problem. I way too often find myself hopelessly locked in a tough spot, where I fight for survival after just 15-20 moves. But do I get a decent position in the middle game then I typically have very good chances of winning against those of similar rating. This is probably due to me being relatively stronger at tactics and endgames compared to my rating group.
Can play w/ a performace rating of USCF 1800 to USCF 1300... not good
I am too impatient...
"I believe the survey would have been more correct if would give the chance to vote for more than one aspect of the game. I'm weak in endgames, openings, positional play, and also tactics (compared to Fritz12)."
Compared only to the tactics of Fritz12, I think that all people can be said to be patzers!
I could have ticked all the choices.It's like a buffet:a little bit of everything.
more concentration- i gave up a knight and a bishop for a pawn in my last game
I seriously suck at converting advantage into victory. Out of my last three rated games in which I won Queen for two light pieces (without any comp for my opponent) I have a draw and 2 loses.
I believe I voted for "positional play" here, but after some thought, I wanted to elaborate. I am only good when I'm losing. Makes no sense, right? Well... I can mess up a winning position quite easily (happens all the time!). However, once I'm in a lost (or losing) position, I put up a heck of a fight! Unfortunately, opponents (after investing some time and effort) usually do find the win.
it looks like i may be the only one who had middle game weakness
I am terrible at tactics. I find tactic books very dull and useless. More of a positional player, I am.
was a game i played with a old guy,the score was 21-10 for me,i lost 5 points because the knights!
sometimes i have a ton of material and i give him the material for no reason.and boom,i lost.
i don't like knights!
Nothing is anyone's problem.
I disagree with all of it.
25 hours ago
11 days ago
2 weeks ago
3 weeks ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!