When you are playing a game of chess and you have a big lead, does it affect the way you play?

Created on Mon, 08/18/2008.

When you are playing a game of chess and you have a big lead, does it affect the way you play?

| view results

Comments:

by sadhumohit - 10 months ago
India
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 14

hahaha..i guess evryone belevs in an easy life

by sstteevveenn - 10 months ago
Wales United Kingdom
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 1453

hmm, I do both the middle 2.  Simplifying is "expanding the lead" usually.  If it's not, then I wont do it.  I would say trading a queen for an opponent's rook to reach a dead won ending counts as both playing hard to expand the lead, and avoiding complications. 

 

If one move swaps off more pieces, but another is 'better' and maybe wins even more material though, I would generally play the better move.  The exceptions being the 'reaching a known won ending' or also if there was some serious counterplay being generated that I could end by playing the, say '2nd best' move as a perfectionist would see it, but in reality making the win easier.

by wormrose - 10 months ago
Lake Tahoe, NV United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 1234

The middle two choises are almost the same thing. Simplifying with a material advantage is going to magnify the material advantage. If there is no easy mate and I feel the opponent is going to keep playing, then I try to exchange as many pieces and pawns as possible to make it look hopeless to the opponent. But I've learned to never just "relax and take it easy". You should always be on the look-out that you might get mated or stalemated or some other kind of draw. These circumstances usually only arise against weaker players, but you should never underestimate your opponent. A wounded animal will fight ferociously.

by rich - 10 months ago
My House United Kingdom
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 18921

I went for the third option.

by usethefork - 10 months ago
Washington United States
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 17

I never have a big lead...why isn't that an option???

by transpositions - 10 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 170

I learned a long time ago through hard lessons in how to lose a won position.  The iron-clad rule is KILL COUNTERPLAY by whatever means possible.

by lukeyboy_xx - 10 months ago
london England
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 4544

i dont often get a big lead so when i do i try and thrash them

by Elubas - 10 months ago
Buffalo United States
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 921

I screw up more big leads than I should. Being ahead is usually alot of pressure! I play even worse when I'm losing. 

by Ellbert - 10 months ago
Baltimore United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 147

If I should have a big lead, I take pause and look very closely at the Chess board. That "lead" I have, may have come to easy.

by normajeanyates - 10 months ago
london [often in calcutta india] England
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 2594

1. look for opps counterplay and take prophylactic measures.

2. Simplify; with the caveats:
1. if you can increase pressure on opps choose that instead
2. exchange the 'right' pieces for a win - don't land up in a difficult or drawn endgame! [Don't simplify blindly, in other words]


Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.