Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Comments


  • 18 months ago

    iamdeafzed

    Evidently 'I. Krush' didn't live up to her name in this game.

    Understandable I suppose though...Irena's kind of a hard name to live up to.

  • 2 years ago

    robby35572

    great game, great analysis, thank you !! (please keep em coming)

  • 2 years ago

    Mighty-Midas

    we love you roman!!  you re good mate

  • 2 years ago

    NM SasaK

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 3 years ago

    greither

    This is a good follow-up to the first video.

  • 3 years ago

    pumpupthevolume247

    Definately a great game!

  • 3 years ago

    jov_eva

    what a nice game........

    ahm......... hope more videos

  • 3 years ago

    FM spjacobi

    Another enjoyable and instructive video by Dzindzi.

    I think that Dzindzi at 21:30 may have overlooked that White was playing to win, not just save the game.  Instead of 1. a5 as played, White could have forced an easy draw with 1. Qa7+.  Black can't interpose 1... Rb7 because 2. Qxb7+ Kxb7 3. Nc5+ forks and wins the endgame.  And 1... Kc6 2. Qa8+ Kd6 3. Qd8+ just repeats the position. 

  • 4 years ago

    JohnSutcliffe

    I know Danny would have never exchanged the bishop for the knight, even if it creates a small weakness for black. He loves the bishop pair, maybe too much. He has admitted it.

  • 4 years ago

    TheWinningGenius

    thanks for the video

  • 4 years ago

    Tigerwarrior808

    Nice game

  • 4 years ago

    rbn000

    Thanks!!!

  • 4 years ago

    wendypat

    its very educative... thanks a lot!

  • 4 years ago

    csharpe

    Thank you, it was helpful.

  • 4 years ago

    WattAce

    Very nice video.  Helpful analysis!

  • 4 years ago

    Burncard

    I vote for VLMJ's idea

  • 4 years ago

    candiladaalvin

    life i like a chess game..,coz if you make a rong move its dificult to set it back.lead your life paitiently and carefuly.

  • 4 years ago

    VLMJ

    As always, great teaching, Roman.  By the way, would you possibly teach a lesson or two on playing for a draw, illustrating as you do, how one can recognize a draw situation and play for it, perhaps commenting also on perpetual checks: how to recognize those situations and play for them?  

  • 4 years ago

    Lawdoginator

    Nice to see Roman analyzing one of Danny's recent games. I saw it during the Spice Cup, but never understood it before. Very nice. 

  • 4 years ago

    pattrik

    Nice game and well analyzed. Thanks!

Back to Top

Post your reply: