Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Comments


  • 10 days ago

    FatesWarningAwaken

    original

  • 2 years ago

    Black__Knight

    Thank you Coach Dejan.

  • 2 years ago

    pumpupthevolume247

    His style was amazing! Great video and analysis to go with it Cool

  • 2 years ago

    sounix

    I really love Dejan's videos, they are so clear and lucid bringing the plans and ideas alive.

  • 2 years ago

    TetsuoShima

    its very illuminating. usually in all books they say black is ok with doubled pawns because of the rooks activity (in nearly similar posiitons i can´t remember). its hard to find out on your own what does it mean, but now you see this game and all of a sudden, yes i understand. 

  • 2 years ago

    dokter_nee

    Wow, that's called being outplayed. Amazing play from Capa, it just looks so easy, but it's so unavoidable almost. Janowski just looked like a bad player in this game. Must have been daunting to be on the opposite side of the board of Capablanca. 

  • 2 years ago

    TheChessJoker

    Niceee :)

  • 2 years ago

    MonkeyMagic

    Excellent lesson. Thanks. Smile

  • 2 years ago

    PAMetalBoss

    Capablanca was a true chess genius. Chess was so much better back then. 

  • 2 years ago

    GM dbojkov

    Thank you for your feedback and comments!

  • 2 years ago

    Razzfazz

    Beautiful game-thank you for showing/explaining it to us ! Great work!!

  • 2 years ago

    TetsuoShima

    i really enjoyed the video, thank you that you took time to reply to my post.

  • 2 years ago

    GM dbojkov

    You are right- the moves that Capablanca played were usually extremely easy to find in hinsight. But the logical sequence was the thing which made the difference.

      Larsen once said that the difference between a GM and a good player is not the fact that they make good or bad moves, but in the frequency of the good moves.

      I said that Capablanca played for a win as he had other obvious continuations which could have "dried" the position and force a draw.

  • 2 years ago

    TetsuoShima

    but why did you say he played for a win, he just played the best positional moves.. i mean even if he played for draw wouldnt that have been the correct moves to make?

  • 2 years ago

    TetsuoShima

    the ironic think is that it alltotally logical and its seems like the most normal and obvious moves to make when you look at it in hindsight.

  • 2 years ago

    TetsuoShima

    The entire game was awesome, i probably saw many capablanca games but this was hands done one of the most interesting to me. Also you did a great job explaining. interesting i saw the move b4 but i didnt see the follow up. Yes the bishop back was really tough to see, i think its because everyone says be agressive dont waste time, develop fast you would never think of such a move.

  • 2 years ago

    MichaelAngelo

    PLEASE ALLOW FAITHFUL USERS THE RIGHT TO DOWNLOAD VIDEOS TO A FILE FOR VIEWING WHEN THEY DO NOT HAVE INTERNET ACCESS. We paid a premium price and should get a premium product. UNLOCK your video library to your subscribers.

Back to Top

Post your reply: