Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Comments


  • 14 months ago

    Eeyore12

    Simply magnificent lecture, precise and detailed when required.

  • 17 months ago

    Black__Knight

    Thanks again Grandmaster Dejan Bojkov.

  • 3 years ago

    GM dbojkov

    THANK YOU!!!

  • 3 years ago

    Black__Knight

    I love your videos and find them to be very instructive. And by the way, I've noticed you seem more relaxed and fluent in your delivery. You're doing a great job and this series is absolutely awesome! Keep up the work.

  • 3 years ago

    lbtr74aao

  • 3 years ago

    FabioR

    Great Video, well, explained!!! Thanks Dejan

  • 3 years ago

    DESTROYER8

    Awesome very instructive.Looking forward for more.

  • 3 years ago

    Nezha

    ... Why couldn't Lasker play Nd7 fork instead of Qd7?

  • 3 years ago

    GM dbojkov

    Everyone has his own favourite players. As far as I remember that Fischer also did not include Lasker in his best 10 players. However, as one of the readers wrote, Kramnik is a great fan of him. 

    I personally greatly appreciate the enourmous impact that all these great champions and their contenders had for the development of chess, adn like them all.

  • 3 years ago

    augustosilveira

    CHESSGUEVARA: It so happens that Lasker is my favorite player. The first chess book I ever read was his Common Sense in Chess.

    Now as for the length of time he was champion, even if you take away the WWI years, plus one for everything to get back on track, we still have 22 left, which is still more time than any other world champion ever by about 6 or seven years

  • 3 years ago

    lbtr74aao

  • 3 years ago

    CHEssGUEVARA

    Tarrasch must of felt like an idiot for talking smack.

    When Lasker is mentioned is usually to emphasize his long reign as World Champion, which was mainly due to WWI's interference I think.  I don't feel like I hear much about him when people talk about their favorite players.  It always seems like Morphy, Steinitz, Capablanca, and Alekhine.  Even Tarrasch is frequently cited as a legend because of some book he wrote.  It seems like Lasker doesn't have the same prestige in his legacy.  Does this seem true to you guys as well?  I mean obviously he is mentioned here in Greatest Minds, but he never seems to be on anyone's shortlist for great players.  Seems odd to me.

  • 3 years ago

    chj50

    Playing as world champion, Lasker uses the "Lasker Defense," against Marshall.Moving to the 28th move we see Marshall sets up a wonderfully sneaky pawn sacrifice trap. Lasker keeping his presence of mind did not take the bait, eventually winning the match convincingly.

    Second game Lasker vs. Tarrasch, using the "Tarrasch Defense."  Tarrasch develops well but at a critical juncture he makes a timid move that changes the nature of the game.

    Note: Lasker introduces the psychological notion of playing against the opening not just the position.

    thanks,

  • 3 years ago

    dapangov

    who can play with?

Back to Top

Post your reply: