Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Comments


  • 6 weeks ago

    Empathy1

    Although GM Shankland meant well, I agree way too fast.

  • 3 months ago

    luckypanther

    It was way too fast. I don't know how many times i had to rewind and I still didn't understand it.

  • 4 months ago

    JGambit

    please do not tell people to slow down in their explainations, My main issue with video format for instruction is how slow it can get at times.

    I can't stand when they keep dragging out obvious idea's.

    If you need to you can always rewatch what is to fast for you.

  • 4 months ago

    Spaniard341

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 9 months ago

    onceayear

    It's very much like watching TV, not a an approach to the QG. He apparently knows a lot, but fails, in my mind at least, to teach.

    He mentions the Botvinik-Variation and then just ... fails to explain.

    Nevertheless, I usually enjoy watching the videos and have learned a ton from them.

  • 10 months ago

    LetsHigh5

    I hate to pile on here, but I have to agree: GM Shankland clearly has impressive knowledge of the QG opening as white or black, but he largely fails to transfer some of that precious knowledge in a clear and succinct manner.  Yes, the video is listed as "advanced", but I think it still fails to live up to its title.  "Variations Galore in the Queens Gambit!" or "A Whirlwind Trip through GM Shankland's Stream of Consciousness Calculations" is pretty much what this series comes down to. 

    I could list a number of constructive criticisms that I think would make this video--and potentially others from Sam--more accessible to his eager audience.  But instead, I think viewing an exemplarly video on an opening would be more helpful.  For that, I would point you to GM Perelshteyn's masterful, three-part video on the "Scandinavian 3...Qa5".  Those videos typify great instruction for a series on a particular opening.  The pacing, explanations, variations, and spiraled reviews contained within create clarity and continuity that are invaluable for learning.  

    I don't want GM Shankland to think he has to "dumb down" his videos too much, but GM Perelshteyn's Scandinavian series shows how tremendously effective a GM can be in helping a mere mortal improve his or her game by simply slowing down a bit, narrating the moves with greater care, and throwing in a review sequence here or there.

  • 11 months ago

    R-Mena

    There are very few explanations in this video. For the most part he darts through main lines and variations, without helping the viewer get a sense of what's going on (it is like reading very quickly an opening book without reading most of the comentary). My bet is that if you are an advanced player that only wants to refresh her memory regarding main lines and variations, this is a great video. However, if you don't know very well the main ideas in the Queen's Gambit already, this video won't help you that much. 

  • 13 months ago

    philoupin

    I realize the target audience of this video is "advanced", but frankly: I would think that anybody so advanced as to be able to follow the different lines mentioned in this vid (often without showing the moves but just mentioning the notation) at this speed, would be be such an advanced player that I can hardly believe they need to see a vid about the first few opening moves of queens gambit? Myself being a beginner, I am really curious about the "why" and "how" of the Q. G. but couldn't find a video at my level.

  • 14 months ago

    Crazymo

    I got to agrea with you, I am kind of unhappy since I happen to play Queen gambit alot, and neeeded, wanted to learn this.

    It is just running true lines in fast tempo, sometimes not even being sure about the lines.

    I learned more from watching 2 min with valeri then 30 min with Sam :/

  • 14 months ago

    PawnAlmighty

    What is the intended audience for Sam's videos ???

    coz every time I want to learn something... It is almost always covered by Master Sam... No matter how hard I try, I don't get a thing. Then I try to learn using databases, engines etc. etc.. add a couple of points to my rating...clear my head... speak to myself "it's ok I am gonna learn from Sam this time..I am gonna understand blah blah blah..." then again I feel disgusted, depressed and lost....

     

    I am sorry, but please master quit it, let Master Valeri or Master Kaidanov handle this. This is not your cup of tea.

    Thanks,

    Mohit

  • 14 months ago

    kqchess

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 15 months ago

    Crazymo

    Why should we play queens gambit when black is doing allright or better in every lines u mention?

  • 19 months ago

    ShutUpAndPlay

    I really like the way you do your videos, you don't spoon feed every detail, but you point out the way and is up to us to do some work.

  • 19 months ago

    shez79

    Way too fast! More for those who already know the queen's gambit.

  • 20 months ago

    Therookman

    This video bounces around too much and too fast to be that instructive. I would rather study less variations in detail.

  • 20 months ago

    Elite_Spartan

    "i've had some strong grandmasters and international masters play the exchange slav, and nobody has ever beaten me" -GM Sam Shankland

     

    This is my favorite quote in this video :D

  • 21 months ago

    bob_mac

    the explanation could be better... too fast, much information at the same time and superficial, I mean it´s missing the player´s mind behind the moves... not just how, but why...

  • 23 months ago

    shepi13

    Here is the Amanov game referenced. It's practically impossible to find this in any databases, but it seems to refute Qd5.

     

    Edit: I don't remember who Amanov beat, but the guy had written a book on the botvinnik Laughing

  • 2 years ago

    RedTatsu256

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 2 years ago

    NimzoRoy

    Interesting and instructive, but also annoying when variations and/or games are mentioned that the instructor "does not recall" exactly. I don't like to criticize other people's efforts esp when they are much more expert in their field than I am, but I'd like to either see any mentioned lines and/or games recalled more exactly or else not mentioned at all.

Back to Top

Post your reply: