Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Comments


  • 14 months ago

    matthew_b_rook

    I dont think it was cut off I think his opponent resined

  • 3 years ago

    HeIsMyDad

    hi

  • 3 years ago

    ChenGJ

    this game was awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!SmileSmileSmileSmileSmileSmileCoolCoolCool

  • 3 years ago

    shady4life

    good video! Thanks.

  • 4 years ago

    John_Rose

    Master Galofre:

    Please do more Live Sessions!  It has been almost six months since your last one.  After all, you are the originator of the series.

  • 4 years ago

    spraff

    could you light up the squares you are talking about

  • 4 years ago

    DonkeyShark

    Disregard, I misread the board

  • 4 years ago

    elmoustro

    My video cut off too. It is not only one person's problem.

  • 4 years ago

    thelittledj

  • 4 years ago

    FRC960

    nice video! thank you. please keep making more of these and 960.

  • 4 years ago

    _Ender_

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago

    csharpe

    I like your videos.  thanks.

  • 4 years ago

    DanQuigley

    It does not matter if the video cut off or not. The instructional value was over. White had a lost position.

    I sense the pawn push late in the game by White with c4 was the reason for White's loss. Black's ...c4 was a threat. I looked at f4 by White so that ...c4 later on could be handled by White with ...Bxc4 and Black's d-pawn could not recapture because of the pin down the d-file. However, after f4 (where White played c4?), then ...Ng4 gives Black counterplay. Therefore, best for White is Be2 (instead of c4?) and White being up the exchange and pawn, he should still be for choice. Right?

    Charles, I am glad you made this video, and I enjoyed listening to you. Rather than having so much dead air when it is your opponent's turn to move, it is okay to discuss your opponent's possibilities in the position with us. I mean, your opponent can't hear you, you know. This is what the IMs who also make these types of videos do. It enhances the instructional value even more. 

  • 4 years ago

    bulletchess4fun

    video gets cutoff....maybe its just me

  • 4 years ago

    WilsonYiuWahWong

    When you played ...Nd3+, White should just give back the exchange since there is a knight fork anyway although the endgame might be drawn, it wouldn't have led to such a massacre. Good job hanging in there and playing actively!

  • 4 years ago

    zspecs

    No because the rook can travel through check but the king cant- and the king didnt

  • 4 years ago

    Saber4

    Its only the king I think that has the rule of not going under attack.

  • 4 years ago

    Lawdoginator

    Did you win the end game? My video cut off. 

  • 4 years ago

    krejci

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago

    honorflamingo

    Thanks for the lecture Charles!  Around 14:20 or so you played Nd7, and I was wondering about the relative merits of Nc4+.  It forced white to trade the bishop for the Knight (or else black gets his pawn back on e2 and forces white into an awkward defense).  This seems to give your bishop more power over the weak light squares that you mentioned earlier in the lecture.

    I'm not sure whether retaking with the pawn or the rook would be better.  I thought maybe Nc4+ Bxc4 dxc4 might reconnect the pawns and give black a better chance.  However, Rxc4 seems simpler, and the rook is going to be more active later on.

Back to Top

Post your reply: