Pogonina vs. Chess.com - Finished - Vote Chess

Chess.com
Pogonina

« Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... | Next »
by didiz1016 - 41 days ago
North California United States
Member Since: Apr 2010
Member Points: 75

Great game

by chessvictor777 - 4 months ago
New York City United States
Member Since: Mar 2010
Member Points: 111

good game, pogonina.  That was a nice forced checkmate

by aryasb_gh - 4 months ago
tehran Iran
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 11

very nice play !!!

by aryasb_gh - 4 months ago
tehran Iran
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 11

i like your playing

by tlaloc2k - 4 months ago
Chicago United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 31

Nice finish, Natalia!!

by avk996 - 5 months ago
Sydney Australia
Member Since: Jan 2010
Member Points: 71

To be contrary, this vote chess thing against a very strong player is a stupid idea. Just becuause there are so many people playing against her, doesn't mean that Chess.com will have any advantage. It is 'subconsciously' perceived that vote chess works like 'A large group of people choose the move they think is best and the best move found is played'. But no, say if the average player in this game was rated, say 1700. The game will be like a 1700-rated player against a WGM! In this way, this game is pointless. However, if it is for entertainment, eg. the 'excitement' of playing against a WGM, I guess this concept is acceptable.

Well done Pogonina and screw you Chess.com for playing the Sicilian (again), and for playing the Najdorf. And screw you Miguel Najdorf and Sicily for inventing the opening that revolutionised openings and forced many players including Bobby Fischer to play a retarded opening that does nothing.

I might be a bit exaggerating here, it's just that I hate the Sicilian, especially the Najdorf. . .And I had to curse Chess.com in some way for losing, but hide the fact that I am going against what I stated before concerning the meaningless idea of this type of vote chess.

by royercordova - 5 months ago
Mexico
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 97

amm well, i've just seen the game beetwen you guys and Natalia (congratulations WGM) instead of 54Qe7?? why not 54Qh4! because with that, the game could last longer,because when 55Rg3 you can play Qh8 defending tha checkmate threat, not allowing a queen trade unless WGM takes on g7 blundering the rook, and well, with not the best position for black, but still playable, you would probably lose because of the pawn youre down but anyway, with queens on board you could try to make counterplay, i think.

And again, congratulations Natalia, also i have to cheer you about the articles you made in chess.com, really instructive!!! thanks a lot for contribute with the chess learning of those who we are not GM's.

by toasterbomb - 5 months ago
Kitchener Canada
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 42

this was a forced checkmate for her.

by pappyboyington - 5 months ago
paris France
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 238

Thank you and congratulations

by IM dpruess - 5 months ago
California United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 1605

Congratulations to Natalia and to chess.com for a great game. I hope to learn more about it as I read further commentaries on the game.

by OVAIDO - 5 months ago
ainzaghouan Tunisia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 108

merci beaucoup natalia ! Wink

by niklai - 5 months ago
Cluj Romania
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 73

Thanks for the game Natalia. It's been an honorSmile

by ARandomPerson - 5 months ago
Canada
Member Since: Dec 2009
Member Points: 384

TBH we were doomed since move one, when our drive-byers wanted to play sicilian because it was the most played at GM level. The reason they gave put the ball in your court. Especially since you are a sicilian expert (judging from the chessgames database).

Have you published your analysis on the dragon?

by alenkanh - 5 months ago
Slovenj Gradec Slovenia
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 1490

Congratulations GM Pogonina Natalia for great game and victory too!

We probably did great mistacke on move 16....Bxd5,because we can not--never push --d5, and our white-squar Bishof protect d5 squar too.But also is posible, that we must choice 1.move e5 instead c5!

 

Alenka,with great respect,Regards

by Aerro - 5 months ago
California United States
Member Since: Jan 2010
Member Points: 3

Thank you for playing against us Natalia =)

Congratulations! You played very well. Thank you for your time, and do your best at that tournament =]

by penguin999 - 5 months ago
California United States
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 15

Natalia, thank you so much for playing us and congratulations on a remarkable win! It's an honor to play against and to learn firsthand from one of the best!

by dnleary - 5 months ago
Hobart Australia
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 2157

gg

by Ixodidae - 5 months ago
Oslo Norway
Member Since: Nov 2009
Member Points: 30

Congratulations and all the best!

by masterdrx - 5 months ago
Mantova Italy
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 464

a very good game and a beautiful young girl . . . 

by WGM Natalia_Pogonina - 5 months ago
Saratov Russia
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 1125

Thanks a lot, guys! Chess.com will soon probably publish an article with my comments on the vote chess process. And then, when I return from the Russian Club Cup, the full detailed analysis of the game: inaccuracies, plans, ideas, advice, etc. 

« Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.