Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Danny Vs The World

Chess.com Members
IM Daniel Rensch

Comments


  • 24 months ago

    cheetahch

    wow

  • 24 months ago

    spanishfly25

    I undestand that sometimes position is more important that one pawn, but after knight takes pawn white has to move rook since now knight is attacking it and also is attacking bishop, the position of that knigh in that square look very strong to me, also after the pawn Knight can take bishop that was in a very strong place. no to mention that pawn was protecting blacks knight which also can be taken with the bishop.

  • 24 months ago

    Sai_300

    @spanishfly25,

    Spending a move capturing the Pawn on d6 is not really worth it because it is an isolated Pawn and because of that, it would have gotten captured eventually. When White moved the bishop to e3, it gained space by taking over that diagonal it was on. It also allowed the Pawn on f2 to move up to f4, kicking the Black Knight away from the strong post on e5.

    The position that White had after those moves were worth more than taking that Pawn.

  • 24 months ago

    spanishfly25

    can someone explain to me why in move 23 white didn't do Qd6

  • 24 months ago

    Sai_300

    @DevashishDhyani

    I hope the diagram explains to you why White resigned. :)
     

  • 2 years ago

    cheetahch

    blunder on move 21 for white

  • 2 years ago

    DevashishDhyani

    he shouldn't have resigned......    first he should have killed the Knight with his Rook and after we kill his Rook with our Bishop,  he should kill the Bishop with his king......................           Then he can also kill the pawn with his bishop.............   please comment for a better explanation................ thnx

  • 2 years ago

    oneawesomeperson123

    Congrats!

  • 2 years ago

    siamakzafarian2

    very nice tanks

  • 2 years ago

    Samsch

    Nice Job Chess.com Members!!!

  • 2 years ago

    edwardw9

    Smilecongratulations

  • 2 years ago

    CheapShotFail

    @ghillan I agree completely about resigning. In my book, it is disrespectful not to resign when you are totally lost. If you're a piece down or so it's fine to continue, but when it is lost like this I give props to Danny for resigning.

    My chess coach advised me that when someone doesn't resign in an over the board tournament to just continue playing and utterly crush them. If they're going to waste your time, have fun with it. 

  • 2 years ago

    ghillan

    @sireidTNX TO POINT THAT OUT:

    tnx to chess.com that made this match even possible!!! 

  • 2 years ago

    ghillan

    @iixxPROxxii .. he could not cover the material difference. Black its ovliously winning. 

     

    In contrary as most people conseder. Resigning its not a lack of respect, its admitting that your hopponent played wel, so instead to hope for blunder you admit that he won. Much respect to IM DANNY for that

     

    SOme people couls not agree , but whose are my 2 cents

  • 2 years ago

    iixxPROxxii

    Good game Danny! May I ask why you resigned?

  • 2 years ago

    hicetnunc

    ok, where's Anand ? Wink

  • 2 years ago

    ghillan

    @IM DANNY: It was an honour to play against you......

  • 2 years ago

    Timothy_P

    Congratulations Chess.com!

  • 2 years ago

    Phoenix35

    Congratulations :)

  • 2 years ago

    darkeval

    Thanks for the game.

Back to Top

Post your reply: