Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Bishops vs Knights

Knights
Bishops

Comments


  • 15 months ago

    AmbitiousFuel

    .

  • 15 months ago

    Vulnerable_King

    .

  • 2 years ago

    1z2x3c4v5b

    fried liver attack wow

  • 2 years ago

    vedras

    [COMMENT DELETED]

  • 2 years ago

    vedras

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 2 years ago

    o0oKENNETHo0o

    Good work guys. I wish I could do this on my friends Fried Liver Attack!

  • 3 years ago

    vedras

    I hope there will be a new voteChess-game soon!Cool

  • 3 years ago

    Mr_Spocky

    poop yay

  • 3 years ago

    Mr_Spocky

    not against the rules dooche

  • 3 years ago

    SanfordHawks

    poop

  • 3 years ago

    DZ888

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 3 years ago

    humdan123

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 3 years ago

    humdan123

    Both pieces are useful at different times.

  • 3 years ago

    TwizzyFizz

    On move 5. after exd5, black should've played Na5. Oh well.

  • 3 years ago

    deandyu

    Lol team bishops's bishop gives checkmate while team knight's knight is in the corner!

  • 3 years ago

    Midnight_637

    cool

  • 3 years ago

    gosteelers

    Rf8? Seriously?

  • 3 years ago

    RickeyHicks

    I enjoyed the game. My personal beliefs on the issue are that the two two pieces are equal, but how effective they are (respectively) in any given game depends on the situation and on the player. If a person sucks with knights then of course they will think bishops are better, and vice versa. And pf course if they are in a situation that facors knights then they will think that the knights are better, and vice versa. Just some basic thoughts. What does everyone else think?

  • 3 years ago

    arin3

    And bishops won... With a bishop.

  • 3 years ago

    Oonland

    Black should have resigned earlier. gg anyway

Back to Top

Post your reply: