Another 26 year old single female journalist further explained: “Mass communications is a new science in post-Soviet countries. Studying and translation of great American and European theorists was forbidden in Soviet period.” According to her a media theorist expert and practitioner is Josef Dzyaloshinskiy, the director of Independent Institute of Communication Studies in Moscow, Russia. She wrote: “He is the first person, who used “civic journalism” expression in CIS countries and started talking about present conditions of post-Soviet media pointing out the issue of quality and credibility.”
However, the other 25 year old journalist stated when she was interviewing Kazakhstani opposition politician Zauresh Battallova, she expressed an interesting opinion: “Our government uses such destructive methods of working, that being credibly informed became impossible for it. Our executives have been in a self-deceive situation for a long time because of their own fault.” The journalist stated further, Frankly, my colleagues and I agreed that sometimes we don’t like our own reports as “their truth” is uncomfortable for us too.
One of the 30 year old female journalists who had very poor English skills while speaking in her interview wrote the following: “The journalism of the CIS countries in many respects still lives by rules of the Soviet journalism. And it is radically incorrect. The world has changed, the USSR has remained in the past, vital principles have changed, the world became more cosmopolitan. And all this should affect on journalists work.
She further explained what she saw was a policy issue: “In our country understanding of “democracy” in my opinion, not absolutely true. Many people count that abusing the government, not offering something in exchange, and not analyzing policy – it is all called “democracy.” But it is in my opinion, incorrectly. Democracy is a pluralism of the proved opinions. It is impossible to tell simply – “work of our government is bad.” The explanation and proofs are necessary.”
A 33 year old married male who was actually in Policy Administration and not a journalist wrote the following in his application: “What have I learned? From my daily interactions I see that Kazakhstan has a wealth of talented and dedicated people but lacks competence in a number of areas required to adequately deal with the challenges of transforming the country’s economy and society. A serious issue is the traditional approach inherited from the Soviet past. For example, Kazakhstan is trying to reform its health and education systems. The outdated mentality, however, finds it difficult to sanction the delegation of autonomy and responsibilities to sub-national governments or to institutions such as hospitals and schools. In my view, however, development is not possible without decentralizing and democratizing public sector governance…”
A 29 year old environmentalist wrote the following as he saw how certain policies inherited from the Soviet era continue to damage Kazakhstan: “Environmental problems in Kazakhstan appeared quite a long time ago. In the Soviet time most of the industries have been built up here, due to Kazakhstan was rather remote from the USSR frontiers. Those industries have been operated for decades, leaving behind contaminated soil, surface and groundwater, air environment. Even today some industries out of operation represent environmental threat…Almost all Kazakhstani specialists working in the field of environment are chemists, biologists, hydrology scientists or economists. Only few could take their degrees in environmental disciplines. In Soviet time, the fact of industrial wastes impact on the environment was not taken in consideration thus there was no need to train such specialists.”
Finally, a 24 year old in Public Health weighed in on what happened to their health care system after the Soviet Union was dismantled: “I think that one of the main reasons of the failed reforms in public healthcare is the absence of professional management due to the fact that in the years of the Soviet Union, nobody prepared specialists-managers of public healthcare…Besides, our textbooks for the fundamental sciences in the medical universities are hopelessly obsolete. And accordingly obsolete are the knowledges of our students.”