19133 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Nice game from the both of you!
Your note after 12.cxd5 is a bit off in the evaluation. You made the right decision to play the Bishop back to d7. Your line given leaves you with opposite colored bishops and the exchange. While the exchange should be enough to win I feel that keeping the Light Squared Bishop to challenged your opponent's Light Squared Bishop is the right way to go.
Long castling would have been better as well as it defends the queenside. You don't have to worry about the "open files" against your king as your opponent only has one rook with which to attack it.
Yes, I doubt you would have played Re1+, the point was that because I didn't properly analyse that line, and just saw Black Rooks on Ranks 1 and 2, I lost 29 Bd5.
I think you played too passively after 15... 0-0, letting me back into the game.If you haven't seen this article yet, then have a read, principle #1 is particularly relevant I think.
When you are winning it's a whole different game
yes you are probably right here is another possibly winning combination for white, allthough passed pawns are very dangerous here for white,I still think there is play for both sides in this continuation, ps in response to bd5 I dont think I would have replyed with re1 as that was just winning for white too easy :-)
Some good analysis there Romantic666.
According to the computer 29 Bd5 was a win for white (look both Rooks and King on a white diagonal...begging for a tactic) but yes, it would have probably ended in a draw...gutted about 29 Ne7+.
Thanks for the game and well played
View complete profile
My games agaisnt Xnaicixision with video analysis by Xnaicixision and annotations by Me
by romanic666 2 years ago
My game agaisnt NM Bill Richards (NM aww-rats)
For the Astronomy lovers out there
by romanic666 3 years ago
Ruy Lopez with nice tactic
Slow swiss#6 round 2
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!