Going Postal

Going Postal

Chacku
  • 2,891 Reads
  • 3 Comments

I've begun my first postal correspondence chess tournament through USCF. Actually, it's the first tournament I've ever played other than those I play on Chess.com.

I was interested in the "old school" chess experience, especially as I read through some of the master level correspondence games in our history. It seems there was an age in chess when reflection on a chess move was a romantic and even spiritual experience. While this may still be true for some of us, I am beginning to wonder if the use of chess databases and computer technology has changed this. I am not sure whether to give in to the pressure of using these chess steroids because everyone else seems to be or quietly rebel. I welcome any guidance from those of you who may have been down this road before.

I believe that there must be some kind of middle ground to discover here. I know that I won't be satisfied as a competitor if I actually "cheat" through the use of a computer (I believe it's illegal in USCF Corrsepondence anyway), however, I don't exactly know where the line is from their perspective. I only know what would "feel" like cheating.

For example, I'm not a strong chess player yet, and I know every game I play is a learning experience, especially as I study openings and the ideas within.

I would feel like I am cheating if I didn't think through the ideas and strategies I am learning about and apply them to the game. I would feel like I am cheating if I simply did what the computer told me to do or just followed what a master player had done before without any thoughtful intention of my own.

So does that mean I get to review my chess literature and utilize chess.com's game explorer to see what others have done in similar circumstances? Isn't this just information gathering? Or am I being seduced by the opportunity to get bigger muscles before I am ready for them?

As I said earlier, I don't know if there is any official answer to these questions and since it can't really be enforced the official answer doesn't really mean much anyway. What does matter is how I feel at the end of a match. 

I still need to make the final call on what move I write on the post card. Correspondence chess takes the memorization of lines out of the game. Whether a person is using rote memory OTB or blindly following moves from a chess database, that person is still missing the chance to experience the brilliance of a true chess player. This brilliance seems to rest within his/her understanding of the possibilities that emerge as each position is reached and the ability to step off that cliff when decision time arrives. I am far from experiencing such brilliance personally, however, I am beginning to appreciate it when I get a glimpse.

I guess we'll see how it turns out for me. We are only at move 5 with 5 other oppponents sending cards and scratch paper back and forth, probably for at least a year. I am getting the chance to actually put pen to paper and place a stamp on a post card which I don't think I am doing for anything else in my life right now. I send all letters and bills electronically so it's been an interesting experience to just write someone's address on a post card and mail it out. I have some other thoughts about the experience that I may write about later. For now, please consider sharing any perspectives about what cheating in correspondence chess means to you. I know that Chess Life just published on this as well so it seems to be of interest to many.

Be well and enjoy the journey.

Chacku (user name Viswamitra)

Online Now