in your opinion should the king be more points?

yes or no? and why?

Probably not. It's a lot of fun that bishop and rook are worth more than the king.

I feel like the reason the king is worth less than the rook and bishop makes gameplay much more interesting... players may choose a hanging piece over a king very often, and I feel like three points is the perfect value.

agreed that way you can sack night for your opponents king

Yes, I agree

I like the game the way it is. No need to rebalance.

I think yeah because it's not really that cool that an ordinary bishop is more valuable than a very important king

Thay would be cool.

4 would be interesting. It would make king sacs a lot less viable, I think, especially in 'gamble plays'.

4 is interesting

Please dont make me learn a new opening. No.