Opening display bug

Sort:
theegreentree

It says Bishops opening: Berlin defense when it should say, Italian game: Guioco Pianissimo, Normal. I have seen this mess up for other openings too:

Martin_Stahl

This is a known issue and being worked on. It's been reported multiple times in the past few weeks.

darklord68617

im going to assume it says this because of the move order it made with. since Bc4 was played before Nf3

Tomtday
darklord68617 wrote:

im going to assume it says this because of the move order it made with. since Bc4 was played before Nf3

In which case it would transpose and show the gucci...? It's a bug buddy.

darklord68617
Tomtday wrote:
darklord68617 wrote:

im going to assume it says this because of the move order it made with. since Bc4 was played before Nf3

In which case it would transpose and show the gucci...? It's a bug buddy.

i know? i never said it wasnt i was just explaining why the bug is happening

JkCheeseChess

this may be the most reported bug within a couple years

Tomtday
Chessesrs wrote:

Yeah game review has a serious problem. When I play endgames with 5 queens [...] if I give a free queen it says best move

This part is not a bug. If you are winning by a significant margin, then even if you lose one queen, your position is still winning enough that it hardly changed the evaluation.

This is reverse in an already losing position. If you are already about to be mated, or somehow going to have a really bad position for whatever reason, then doing something bad like blundering a piece (which would normally be a blunder) would instead just be something like an inaccuracy, because it doesn't affect the evaluation that much.

JkCheeseChess
Tomtday wrote:
Chessesrs wrote:

Yeah game review has a serious problem. When I play endgames with 5 queens [...] if I give a free queen it says best move

This part is not a bug. If you are winning by a significant margin, then even if you lose one queen, your position is still winning enough that it hardly changed the evaluation.

This is reverse in an already losing position. If you are already about to be mated, or somehow going to have a really bad position for whatever reason, then doing something bad like blundering a piece (which would normally be a blunder) would instead just be something like an inaccuracy, because it doesn't affect the evaluation that much.

giving up a free queen is never the best move unless there's a forced mate lol

Tomtday
TheCheeseDuck wrote:
Tomtday wrote:
Chessesrs wrote:

Yeah game review has a serious problem. When I play endgames with 5 queens [...] if I give a free queen it says best move

This part is not a bug. If you are winning by a significant margin, then even if you lose one queen, your position is still winning enough that it hardly changed the evaluation.

This is reverse in an already losing position. If you are already about to be mated, or somehow going to have a really bad position for whatever reason, then doing something bad like blundering a piece (which would normally be a blunder) would instead just be something like an inaccuracy, because it doesn't affect the evaluation that much.

giving up a free queen is never the best move unless there's a forced mate lol

"best move" doesnt always mean the best move. I'm not saying its the literal best move, just that the analysys will call it that