16146 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This book written by Dan Heisman. Has anyone got this book. Is it any good ?
thank you, I saw that but I would like to hear it from someone here.
I have it. I've read it. Having read his publically available articles, I found nothing that was new to me or really changed the way I looked at chess.
It's an OK book. Not great, not horrible. If you're a Dan fan, having it in your library won't hurt.
hmm...so I take that as a 50/50 then. (c8
All of Dan Heisman's books seem to be good, but you certainly don't need them all. I recently perused "The Improving Annnotator" in a bookshop and - as Kingpatzer said - there was nothing really new in it when compared to his other books (I have "The Improving Chess Thinker" and "A Guide To Chess Improvement - Best of Novice Nook").
So alot of the stuff from The Improving Annotator are in the Novice Nook ?
That isn't quite what I wanted to say. I remember that there wasn't very much stuff in the book anyway. There were annotated example games. I concede I only perused it for a couple of minutes, but I'd say the only really new thing I saw was some good and methodical advice about how to go about annotating your own games. This was laid out in the introduction on ten pages or so at the most. It just wasn't enough for me to buy the book.
There are two ways to look at this book:
1) As a nice little annotated collection of Heisman's game and career. If you look at it that way, it is an okay book.
2) As a book to help one learn how to get better at annotating one's own games. If you look at this way it is a HORRIBLE book! I purchased it because I was under the impression it would give guidance on how to get better an analysing and annotating my own games. Under those circumstances the book was a COLOSSAL waste of money!
And i LIKE Dan Heisman but this book is NOT worth the money.
The book is a bit of a pot-boiler, in my opinion.
Does this happen to you?
by NiceCuppaTea 6 minutes ago
My most recent chess game, any advice?
by HorsesGalore 7 minutes ago
What do you think to my attacking win?
by Invictus22 13 minutes ago
St. Louis Chess Club On YouTube
by hercules227 14 minutes ago
2/8/2016 - Neumann-Hernandez Dresden 1969
by scibot1234 23 minutes ago
Another Capablanca's Chess Fundamentals midllegame blunder ?
by Vinedrinker 27 minutes ago
A Vintage American Drueke Set
by cgrau 31 minutes ago
Did "Rapid Chess Improvement" by Michael de la Maza work for you?
by petrip 38 minutes ago
Is there a software that can rate your games?
by Roeland_Klaassen 44 minutes ago
My Refutation To The Fried Liver!
by Improvingforever 44 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!