11799 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Just looking for any feedback about my latest chess mentor course published in August, "Exploiting Opening Errors 2." I hope it's enjoyed and helpful, and if there's any good advice I can use it to make my future courses even better.
You did state that this was for stronger players, so I can't very well complain that it was too tough, but my 49% average score was a bit discouraging. Definitely not a course for beginners. I guess that my inexperience with most of the openings made it more difficult to get a feel for the positions. Do wish you guys would either eliminate the alternative correct answers or give the main line correct answer as a reward for coming up with an equally strong move. You have no idea how frustrating it is to come up with a good move, have it acknowledged as such, and then not be able to find the "correct" answer. I do plan to go back over the course however and bang away at it until I can 100% it.
I'm in agreement with baddogno mostly. 40% of my score being dropped for one wrong answer seems a bit much. A lot of the lessons featured relatively useless subtle hints, such as the "wrong knight" lesson. The subtle hint basically restates what led up to the position and restates what mistake you are looking at. On the other hand, in London goes down 2 the subtle hint is excellent. I didn't find the answer immediately because of it, but after I did the hint made perfect sense. The lessons themselves are definitely good for players trying to strengthen their opening skills. Maybe it would help to show the lines that led to the position?
Poorly written course in my opinion. It doesn't teach in a constructive way.
The tone of the instruction in the course is condescending. There is very littlle constructive advice about how to figure out what the best move is. Many of the wrong answers say "this is a good move but your wrong" doesn't offer any advice on why the move isn't correct. I went through the entire course and can honestly say I haven't really learned anything from it. Unlike a lot of the other courses where I have learned quite a bit.
7/25/2016 - What Must Be Done
by lenslens1 a few minutes ago
tournaments won't let players play up?
by JuergenWerner a few minutes ago
Beginner, intermediate and master... A puzzle for each
by Bilbo21 5 minutes ago
A sad sad loss
by JuergenWerner 10 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by DjonniDerevnja 11 minutes ago
by MACRINUS 19 minutes ago
Am I a fool for not playing 1. e4
by chesskingdreamer 24 minutes ago
The word we can not mention !
by LegoPirateSenior 24 minutes ago
7/24/2016 - Attack And Defense
by Kiwichess5 26 minutes ago
A Puzzle no Grandmaster solved until Tal solved it
by 1NaturalDisaster 34 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!