1.d4 refuted...?

  • #121
    D_for_DJ wrote:
    billyblatt wrote:

    Email this to Carlsen before its too late.

    all ready did.

    email my opening and its variations to Magnus Carlsen...

  • #122
    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • #123

    Cool

  • #124
    FirebrandX visited chesspub:
    TitanCG routinely misses the point:

    I think this is the "Dzinzi Indian defence.

    So it would seem:

    http://www.chesspublishing.com/content/10/jan12.htm

    The original Dzhindzhi Indian was

    1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 e6 3 Nf3 a6 4 Nc3 c5 5 d5 b5

  • #125

    bvump

  • #126

    bvump

  • #127
    Irontiger wrote:
    dmvdc wrote:
    schlechter55 wrote:

    there are whole books written about 1.d4 c5. this alone puts the rigorous claim that 1....c5 would be a 'mistake', in doubt.

    Hardly. I take no position on 1.d4 c5, whether it's good, bad, ugly, refuted, or sound. But whole books being written about something in chess reflects absolutely nothing about the topic. It just means someone needed a payday.

    Yep. I didn't need to search a source very far : http://www.amazon.com/Challenging-Sicilian-With-Repertoire-Books/dp/9548782375

     

    """"

    Only costs $117 per copy. USED!

  • #128

    bump

  • #129

    Bump

  • #130

    Why do you keep bumping this dumbass topic? 

or Join

Online Now