22782 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
1.e4...c5 2.c4 I mean.
I've looked at this opening and I don't see anything really wrong with it yet it's never played and those who play it apparently lose almost always on white.
What's so bad about this opening? It develops 2 pawns into the centre of the board.
Developing pawns is almost always the same as creating a weakness, and here the d4 square is severely weakened. Much better would be to develop a piece, or at least make a different pawn move that doesn't make a huge weakness.
Yup. d4 is severely weakened giving black a nice square to outpost a piece.
This is playable, or at least some believe so:
Yes, it's playable, but look at those stats.. heavily favoring black. So basically white hands over the advantage to black.
it also hems in the white square bishop and doesn't let out any piece that wasn't already free to leave.
I think 1.Bd3/e2 would be better insead of c4.
Can't you just play nf3 to protect the d4.. I know it's not good, but what makes its SO bad.. It literally loses 75% of the time while not doing anything dubious or ridiculous.
a3 is much better.
nothing wrong with it, c4 is not a bad move. But the wing gambit would be better!
c4 is fine, i feel that in order to capitalize on any sort of weakness here black has to create weaknesses of his own for example ...2 Nc6 3 Nf3 and black is forced to play 3... e5 in order to stop 4 d4 from white, which would leave him in what i feel is a very pleasant position which is very open and leaves black scrambling a few moves behind to establish some sort of central control. but after e5, white can use his one move advantadge and play moves like d3, nc3 - d5, ideas of a4 -a5 and b4 at some point seem apropriate, and an eventual fiachetto of the light square bishop. White's chances are good, and his one move advantadge is put to full effect. Its a matter of preference really, but i think it is strong if played correctly.
By transposition, White still can play d4, and after the exchange we will have pretty much the so-called Maróczy Bind.
The moves 1.e4 c5 2.e4 is the foundation of the so-called Botvinnik System Here's a GM example of this variation
Here's another example of a win against GM Larry Christiansen http://www.365chess.com/game.php?gid=2482708
I use the Botvinnik system myself..
2/7/2016 - Quick And Painless
by WillHua a few minutes ago
Somebody explain the rules please
by FuzzleOIL 2 minutes ago
What do you think to my attacking win?
by kareldevries 6 minutes ago
i play chess like mikhail tal what are good openings for me?
by Nckchrls 6 minutes ago
new game time out
by ANOK1 7 minutes ago
Data analysis: Difference between Male/Female ratings
by InfiniteFlash 9 minutes ago
Who will win Candidates 2016
by watcha 10 minutes ago
My most recent chess game, any advice?
by Invictus22 10 minutes ago
chess960 players vs standard chess players
by otto-von-zoliccau 12 minutes ago
2/8/2016 - Neumann-Hernandez Dresden 1969
by deviant17 13 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!