14669 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I don't see how it is lost...
5.Ng5 isn't even necessary. White can just simply develop with 5.Nc3 in a much easier position, while Black's formation is full of holes, his development is awkward, and it's not even clear how he can even really proceed to get any good counterplay, especially since his only real idea of a pawn break, c7-c5, is hampered by the e7-pawn blocking in the dark-squared bishop. White already has a big advantage after five moves, while I honestly cannot find any reedeeming factor in Black's position. If it isn't lost already, then it's so bad that I'm sure even a tiny inaccuracy will make sure that it's lost.
While we're on the subject of this position, please explain what the point of 4...Be6? is, because I am truly confounded. Similar ideas in the Snake Benoni "work" because the goal is to transfer the bishop to a possibly better diagonal, either the e1-a5 or a1-h6 diagonals. Here, however......to put it mildly, that bishop is useless on e6. Might as well explain the point behind 2...g6 as well, and why you think it's better for white to play 3.e5?! instead of the more natural and superior 3.exf5.
Be6 is to throw off your opponent into thinking he/she wins.
It certainly succeeds at that by making Black's position much worse. Makes it a kind of self-fulfilling prophecy, in fact.
Yeah, this 3. exf5 idea seems to win. Black goes into full defense on turn 3.
If I was gonna play all that stuff, I Would probably play 5...Bg7 rather than ...Rg8. Might as well keep the rook on the h-file, and the king can go to f8. Not sure it will do much better, but at this point, why cling to the pawn on g6?
What's wrong with 2...fxe4?
My computer suggests g5! which develops the pawn and allows the bishop to fianchetto on g7. The h5-e8 diagonal is weakened, but thats only a minor problem! After g5!, the f4 and h4 squares are controlled by black and black is better -+ good game well played
My computer is so smart right?
Ha ha umm no.
Nothing at all, but if you are gonna play that gambit for whatever reason, why play ...Rg8?
I'm not really sure if it matters too much but even after a move like Bg7 White is going to have pawns on d4 and c3 that play against that bishop. I figure if White allows fxe4 then Black can just get rid of White's center pawn without having to gambit anything.
I totally agree. I am a Dutch player, so I wouldn't hesitate to play ...fxe4. I have actually played e4 f5 quite a few times for kicks. I think it requires a pawn gambit to get reasonable play.
I don't understand the OP. Is the idea to exhibit a game with the most consecutive blunders?
The idea is to have fun.
Seems to me chess is more fun if you respect the objective of the game. Here is my view. (?? means probably changes the theoretical result, ? means may possibly change the result.)
1.e4 f5?? 2.d4?? g6?? 3.e5? d5? 4.Nf3 Be6 5.Ng5 Qd7
So it's not all bad.
[Exercise: spot the often quite obvious best moves].
P.S. I checked my assessment with an engine and the assessments above are consistent with it, I am pleased to say.
Well, this might be true, and so the handicap that the superior side received was having to start after 1. e4 f5 2. exf5. However, they were able to use Stockfish and what not. Many greats in the past offered odds, and they still do this (often time odds these days).
I should point out that I mistook post #381 for the OP! It's that damn white on light grey.
Perhaps this might explain any misunderstanding.
I think you should read the entire thing, this thread is a great fun read!
Of course the assessments stand.
If You Could Go to Dinner with Any Chess Player, Who'd You Pick?
by Strangemover a few minutes ago
Rating adjustments after game
by Martin_Stahl 2 minutes ago
Jealous of other Success
by stuzzicadenti 3 minutes ago
Is this a trick/gimmick opening?
by ikerus 7 minutes ago
is there a way to decline challenges?
by lofina_eidel_ismail 7 minutes ago
What is the best way to distract your opponent in over the board chess?
by Nobama77 9 minutes ago
by egoole 10 minutes ago
Calculation--when to do it?
by vinco_interdum 26 minutes ago
why is there increment in 3 minute blitz?
by MyRatingis1523 28 minutes ago
Silicone Chess board with a SMOOTH top?
by wiscmike 29 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!