19739 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
To many ppl (including me) endings are not every interesting. You don't even have to know them if you play as well as Houdini, in which case your games will be over in 25 moves, which I suppose is why people pay attention to the opening.
Sorry to say that you are wrong.
The endgame is the most interesting part of the game, because there every slight mistake is usually fatal.
You don't even have to know them if you play as well as Houdini...
Oh, here are two slight issues:
- You cannot play as Houdini.
- Houdini plays the endgame as an idiot. Maybe even worse than that.
Usually (not always), Houdini will win an endgame where he is material up for no compensation- but in general, he plays endgames extremely poorly. I will soon pass an example (correspondence game of mine, not finished yet) where in an endgame with queens and opposite-colored bishops, one side being two pawns up, Houdini suggests as "best" all the continuations the weak side draws comfortably, or retains good drawing chances.
I know I can't play as well as Houdini, but that's what opening preperation is for, right? What I was trying to say when I said that if people played like Houdini was that you wouldn't reach an endgame as the position would be decided by the middlegame or even the opening.
And plus, slight mistakes can cause the loss of a game in the middlegame as well, especially sharp middlegames.
Anyways, I was just saying that I found the middlegame more interesting compared to the endgame, its an opinion.
2/12/2016 - Corner Pocket
by jusiri a few minutes ago
People deliberately running out the clock instead of resigning
by Larissy 6 minutes ago
Sicilian - Be2 or Be3?
by pfren 9 minutes ago
Why Magnus Carlsen is so overrated?
by BigKingBud 11 minutes ago
How's this white response to Caro Kann?
by Diakonia 14 minutes ago
Millionaire Chess 2!!
by themaskedbishop 23 minutes ago
How to play live in Chess 960
by ArtNJ 25 minutes ago
why cant i verse hikaru nakamura
by chad0 27 minutes ago
GOOD PLAYERS PLEASE ANALYSE THIS GAME
by vishnudathvd 29 minutes ago
by ripachu 33 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!