But White's DSB is so strong on f4...
Amazing New opening!!!
Sort:
I started to list the rediculousness of this "opening" but then decided to not even start...
Diakonia wrote:
I started to list the rediculousness of this "opening" but then decided to not even start...
lol good decision.
Believe it or not, i used to play this, but i realized that the knights development to f7 took too much tempo. If white plays passively, black can capitalise, though. Requires more study.
Move order is wrong though, taking the knight in move three win a piece, because if gxknight, quees a5 mate. Better play g6 first
12Knaves wrote:
Believe it or not, i used to play this, but i realized that the knights development to f7 took too much tempo. If white plays passively, black can capitalise, though. Requires more study.
No way... Two patzers seperately came up with the exact same silly idea, then both proceeded to like and play it? I don't buy it.
12Knaves wrote:
Move order is wrong though, taking the knight in move three win a piece, because if gxknight, quees a5 mate. Better play g6 first
Was this on your list, Diakonia?
ChessOath wrote:
12Knaves wrote:
Move order is wrong though, taking the knight in move three win a piece, because if gxknight, quees a5 mate. Better play g6 first
Was this on your list, Diakonia?
Ive moved on to the next train wreck...
I remembered playing this a lot in bullet back when I was like 1900
3. Bxh6 and that is a free knight. If gxh6, then comes Qh5 mate. And White checkmates Black in only 4 moves.....
@chessoath haha. Well, I was trying to be original back then, was blissfully unaware of opening theory and tactics. :)
12Knaves wrote:
@chessoath haha. Well, I was trying to be original back then, was blissfully unaware of opening theory and tactics. :)
I don't even know what to think anymore lol. If adumbrate wasn't joking, which I don't think he was, then maybe I'm wrong. Maybe this isn't as strange and as bad as it looks. Maybe you were onto something almost sound! I have a lot of rethinking to do...
Dont like touching the knight twice so soon....
ChessOath wrote:
Diakonia wrote:
I started to list the rediculousness of this "opening" but then decided to not even start...
lol good decision.
Fine, then I'll list the rediculousness of this "opening".
It is renamed to "Black's-a-Moron Defense".
White is under no obligation to play 3.c4, not that there is anything wrong with that move, but still, he's under no obligation, and can play Nc3 instead, or even 3.Bxh6 if he's rated over 1000, especially given he hasn't committed to castling Kingside, and might actually find a quicker win after Black takes the "Poisoned Bishop"! (Hope someone can see the extreme sarcasim!)
Secondly, 7.Bf4 is stupid - a move made by the OP to try to beef up the hype of his moronic line.
If this line is your definition of "good for Black", maybe Tac-Tac-Toe is more your level of game. Leave chess for the big boys!
Name: Fortress Defense, center attack variation.