23055 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I believe the future of chess may be not in obtaining an opening advantage, but in understanding certain positions better than ones opponent.There are several Russian Grandmasters that play the white side of the Giuoco Pianissimo not with any great expectation of obtaining an opening advantage, but to instead reach a position that they understand better than their opponent.Hence, the Giuoco Pianissimo scores well for them.Against the Caro Kann I personally like 1.e4 c6 2.Nf3 d5 3.ed5 cd5 4.Ne5 a favorite of Morozevich.No opening advantage here, but a contest on understanding the positions reached is what ensues.Thank you for your excellent insights.
That's not quite a 'pleasant initiative' white has there. Black is ultra-solid with no weaknesses. Really the only thing white has going is the bishop pair, but the position is such that they are not an active factor.
'Initiative' generally means you're directing the replies from your opponent such that he doesn't have time to make his own plans. It doesn't apply here because black can either address or completely ignore moves like a4, g3, or Be3. The position is in fact quite equal, regardless of engines giving white +0.20 or whatever insignificant value they give this position.
FYI, GM Shankland assigns black as being 'perfectly fine' after 10.c3 Nf6.
Totally agree with what u said!
Do you have any example games from Moro in that line? I know he likes jumping around with his knights, but I haven't seen him play that particular idea.
I don't see any games by Morozevich in that line in the last six years. Lines like that and the Two Knights Variation are based on getting out of established theory, where Black is very hard to crack, and into unfamiliar positions where he may make a mistake.
If you play it enough in slow games over time, you can become familiar with a position your opponent is unlikely to have played often, as armstrong789 suggests - but your advantage is only experience, basically you are hoping the opponent will stumble because of his lack of experience in the positions.
As a C-K player, I have to agree that White's best chance for advantage is the Short line and trying to gradually create play based on development and the space advantage. But even in that, I think White has to play well to emerge with a "normal" advantage from the opening without help from Black.
In the Nd2 line orginally mentioned by OP, the sounder continuation is Nb3, delaying c5, rather than g4. Then continuing like Short system with Nf3, be2 , 0.0 etc. White has a phleasant position to play there. Theoretically one of black's best ideas is to crawl on the back rank with Ng8-e7-c8, which isn't too terrifying for white.
In one game so far played in this line, messed up my ideas quite a bit but still got a better position, especially since opponent when out of book started playing very strange moves. For club players don't think these positions are very easy to play for black at all.
Yes, understanding certain positions better than one's oppeonent is an advantage. But we cannot forget about transpositions. While you are busy achieving a position that you know better than your opponent, he has been busy with his tournament preparation fine tuning his knowledge of transpositional junctures that change all the hard work you did to achieve that position.
Such is the life of a 'professional gunslinger' (very strong player.)
The Czech player Cernousek is the main advocate of 4.Ne5.A good game worth studying however is Morozevich/Dreev, Monte Carlo 2005 (blindfold)Volume 2 of "Secrets of Opening Surprises" has a chapter by Ian Rogers on 4.Ne5 also in Vol. 2 is a chapter on the Albin Counter Gambit with all Morozevich's pet lines as black.A very fine issue.
"Nakamura vs Vachier-Lagrave: GM Blitz Battle Chess"
the blind leading the blind,
by ReddyJ 2 minutes ago
BCM Iron Knights Swiss Round 8 (4)
by chessperson2222222 4 minutes ago
Isn't It Impossible to Compare Players From Different Eras?
by BlargDragon 9 minutes ago
Tired of sandbagging players
by ChessOfPlayer 16 minutes ago
CAN ANYONE WITH 2300 OR MORE BLITZ RATING CHALLENGE ME PLEASE LIKE I CANT FIND A GAME 😱 MY RATING
by PlayChessPoorly 16 minutes ago
Question about computer analysis
by iamdanthemanstan 42 minutes ago
by ChessPlayinDude47 44 minutes ago
I feel like I'm a genius when solving tactics but a moron when playing a real game
by Salem-Saberhagen 47 minutes ago
Rematch Request Etiquette
by Robert_Moody 51 minutes ago
What do you say when people ask how good at chess you are ?
by PlayChessPoorly 60 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!