Do you play the Haha over the OTB... ?
Learn to read before talking. You won't ask silly questions this way.
Now listen punk. I play chess for over 40 years. Your Haha system is a troll in it self. No chess player with any knowledge and respe
Wow, sir, sorry sir. What have you achieved in those 40 years? Did you learn some manners or it was too much for you?
PawnGrabber, explain. What is wrong with my manners?
You come to my thread and start attacking me, calling me punk and insisting that the thread should be closed because you are a JOURNALIST who has played chess for over 40 years. As if anyone care.... What's the problem with you man? Enough is enogh.
I figured as much...condescention... I shouldn't have to read an entire thread for a detail or two I might have missed. I should be able to show up an ask a simple question or two that pertains to the thread. I didn't ask a question requiring a book lengthed response. If that is too much for you to handle, I'd suggest you stick to writing articles in which you don't have the possibility of having to interact with your readers afterward...
Are the players rated that you play otb with using the Haha system ? Are the games rated ?
what is this ?
the family court ?
The show was called "The People's Court "
yes i know
And this is why speed games are only a crude representation of an actual chess game. Of course you can get away with playing whatever you like.
Don't get him started again... unless you brought your canoe...
kids get so jealous.
I have started a correspondance game with Mr. GreedyPawnGrabber (with him playing the Haha), and though i may have made comments praising the opening in blitz play, i think his idea that victory in correspondence is ludcris. Follow the game!
cool, ive been wanting to see this since like, forever, like a few hours ago! fight, fight! show him a thing or two. come on! oh yeah, correspondence. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..........................
LMAO. I know lol. But i want a way to truly show that any thing i hear about the 80% this opening wins or other hogwash is truly... hogwash
yeah, do the math
I think I will do a t-16 analysis of the game afterwards to better assess it's viability and the level of play that was asserted throughout it...
Too many talking too few facts.I can beat you with the two side opening any day...
Perhaps. But I am not sure about that. In a normal FIDE time control (for example in the 90-90 minutes+30 seconds per move) I would have great chances to outplay such a dubious opening. I do not know your real rating, your blitz rating is 2100+, but it does not matter. (It is easier to get rating here, then to get FIDE ratings, you only have to take it seriously, I do not do it.) Blitz does not contain the whole chess.
"Yes, I have. Have wins against 2100+."
Here, or in real life games? By the way, it would be funny to send this topic (opening) to a grandmaster.
And your opening has another mistake. There is a rule which states: against a wing attack, a counterattack in the center is the most effective.So, your opening can be good in blitz, but in longer game it is ridiculous.
But this opening can be good as a secret weapon in blitz, I will try it out.
"We're caught in a trap I can't walk out Because I love you too much baby Why can't you see What you're doing to me When you don't believe a word I say? We can't go on together With suspicious minds And we can't build our dreams On suspicious minds"