Danish Gambit crushes black.

Sort:
TheLateVRules
The Danish Gambit starts like this 1e4,e5,2d4,exd4,3,c3 After a few more moves black is crushed into a million pieces.
spell_part_backwards

If the Danish Gambit was truly that good they would just transpose into the Nimzowitch Defense.

TheLateVRules

If they play the Nimzowitch defense I will transpose it into the Scotch game.

ThrillerFan

The Danish Gambit is a total joke.  Black equalizes EASILY!

 

1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.c3?! dxc3 (3...d5 is also good) 4.Bc4 cxb2 5.Bxb2 d5! 6.Bxd5 Nf6 7.Bxf7+ Kxf7 8.Qxd8 Bb4+ 9.Qd2 Bxd2+ 10.Nxd2 and White has nothing!  0.00!

RorschachTest1

according to hikaru nakamura 4 Nxc3 is superior to 4 Bc4

hehakfy

Nxc3 is definitely more problematic than Bc4 precisely because of the line TF provided. That's why I play 3..d5

ThrillerFan
RorschachTest1 wrote:

according to hikaru nakamura 4 Nxc3 is superior to 4 Bc4

 

4.Nxc3 is not the Danish Gambit.  It is the Goring Gambit.

JackRoach

Danish Gambit OP

RorschachTest1
ThrillerFan wrote:
RorschachTest1 wrote:

according to hikaru nakamura 4 Nxc3 is superior to 4 Bc4

 

4.Nxc3 is not the Danish Gambit.  It is the Goring Gambit.

as far as i can tell the goring gambit is a variant of the scotch game...

nighteyes1234
hehakfy wrote:

Nxc3 is definitely more problematic than Bc4 precisely because of the line TF provided. That's why I play 3..d5

You should be playing much better. d5 is noobish.

4....bb4 is good till 2000 range.

ThrillerFan
nighteyes1234 wrote:
hehakfy wrote:

Nxc3 is definitely more problematic than Bc4 precisely because of the line TF provided. That's why I play 3..d5

You should be playing much better. d5 is noobish.

4....bb4 is good till 2000 range.

 

I only play what is good at all ranges.  If it is no good at the GM level, I will not play it!

hehakfy
nighteyes1234 wrote:
hehakfy wrote:

Nxc3 is definitely more problematic than Bc4 precisely because of the line TF provided. That's why I play 3..d5

You should be playing much better. d5 is noobish.

4....bb4 is good till 2000 range.

4..Bb4 after Nxc3 isnt very good imo. 3 .. d5 isn't noobish. It equalizes easily.

nighteyes1234
ThrillerFan wrote:
nighteyes1234 wrote:
hehakfy wrote:

Nxc3 is definitely more problematic than Bc4 precisely because of the line TF provided. That's why I play 3..d5

You should be playing much better. d5 is noobish.

4....bb4 is good till 2000 range.

 

I only play what is good at all ranges.  If it is no good at the GM level, I will not play it!

You dont play anything. If you did youd know then is even better at gm level. But its too complicated....just like kings gambit. Bb4 is nothing to scoff at though.....winning 1 free pawn, same as goring.

ThrillerFan
nighteyes1234 wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
nighteyes1234 wrote:
hehakfy wrote:

Nxc3 is definitely more problematic than Bc4 precisely because of the line TF provided. That's why I play 3..d5

You should be playing much better. d5 is noobish.

4....bb4 is good till 2000 range.

 

I only play what is good at all ranges.  If it is no good at the GM level, I will not play it!

You dont play anything. If you did youd know then is even better at gm level. But its too complicated....just like kings gambit. Bb4 is nothing to scoff at though.....winning 1 free pawn, same as goring.

 

I never scoffed at Bb4.  I said I only play what is good up thru the GM level.

What I am scoffing at is his idea of playing something simply because it is good up thru 2000, implying it is no good beyond 2000 because in reality it is bad, like the Latvian Gambit.

Nowhere did I say 4...Bb4 is no good at the GM level, I said "If it isn't good at the GM level".

 

Learn to read.  Pffff - "You don't play anything", I'd kick your sorry a** in a French (either color)!