Defences to the Parham Attack


  • 4 years ago · Quote · #241

    Yereslov

    pfren wrote:

    Nakamura has played the Parham just twice under regular time controls, and was lucky to score half a point with it. All the rest from him are blitz games. Last game dated 2005.

    Please go on with your picturesque nonsense.

    Did you read his comment. He said he had even game had he played the middle game properly.

    The opening had nothing to do with the games.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #242

    Yereslov

    Rubidium wrote:

    How about respect?

    That's an IM you're talking to.

    I don't care who he is.

    It means crap to me.

    The opening is playable and several GM's suport it.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #243

    Eris_Discordia

    Who are these 'several GM's'?

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #244

    gambiteer12

    Nakamura said it was playable. Saying its playable is not the same as supporting it. The Muzio Gambit is playable and many other stupid things named after animals. Several GM's???? Quotes please?

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #245

    Yereslov

    For one Andrew Martin and Hikaru Nakamura.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #246

    The_Gavinator

    <--- this guy exclusively played the Parham Attack.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #247

    Yereslov

    gambiteer12 wrote:

    Nakamura said it was playable. Saying its playable is not the same as supporting it. The Muzio Gambit is playable and many other stupid things named after animals. Several GM's???? Quotes please?

    "I do believe that 2.Qh5 is a playable move, in fact I had a very good position in the game, and was close to winning if I had in fact played 23.e5."

    Hikaru Nakamura

    Between players of rank 1400-2400 this opening is fine. 

    Unless you're playing a Super GM,

    The game will be even. You are arguing from the point of view of machines.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #248

    Rubidium

    NM

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #249

    The_Gavinator

    Yes he is a National MASTER. And Nakamura said he was WINNING, against a 2600.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #250

    CHCL

    The_Gavinator wrote:
     

     Mr. Parham is a NM, IM Pfren world be able to beat him.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #251

    Yereslov

    CHCL wrote:
    The_Gavinator wrote:
     

     Mr. Parham is a NM, IM Pfren world be able to beat him.

    Nakamura is in the top ten. Are you trolling?

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #252

    Eris_Discordia

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #253

    The_Gavinator

    Eris_Discordia wrote:

    Nakamura wouldn't play the Parham.

    http://www.365chess.com/search_result.php?search=1&m=4&n=838&ms=e4.e5.Qh5.Nc6&wid=8099

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #254

    CHCL

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #255

    Rubidium

    with two draws...

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #256

    Eris_Discordia

    I'm sorry I didn't finish my statement. Nakamura wouldn't play the Parham in a real game against pfren, based on the fact that he hasn't played the Parham in seven years.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #257

    The_Gavinator

    GM's tend to draw, I know you're not very smart, but that's how it is.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #258

    CHCL

    On that database Black had a 59% win ratio, which is not very good.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #259

    The_Gavinator

    CHCL wrote:

    On that database Black had a 59% win ratio, which is not very good.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #260

    Eris_Discordia

    That tells us that white won 7 games, black won 6 games, and 4 were drawn. Which proves absolutely nothing.


Back to Top

Post your reply: