22632 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Here is the champion of 1 a4 :
Playing 1 a4 is like ....
Now this would make more sense if we talked about .....
When I was a kid I would sometimes open with a4 because how else was I supposed to get my rooks out.
I've played against 1.a4 players only in bullet 1|0 games, it might throw off beginners and weak players but once you are accustomed to a few openings and understand the basic opening theory you care very little of a4 and begin to solidify the centre creating more avenues of attacking potential whereas a4 is strictly a flank attack.
It wasn't too long ago when the issue of photos/images were being uploaded onto chess.com was being abused, inappropriate pictures should and I believe will be removed and members always get warned. Its a chess site with minors, if you want to view such content do so with out publicising your recreational activities hobby on here.
When white plays a4 on move 1 it is equivalent to giving the other player the white pieces. In top level chess the player with white has a significant advantage. Why give up that advantage?
... if you want to view such content do so with out publicising your recreational activities hobby on here.
You aren't making sense here.
e4 is better because you can play ke2 second move. 1. a4 2. ra2? doesn't give enough extra options to white's rook.
Yeah, that is one of the main reasons why I like to play 1.e4. However, if I'm playing for a draw, then I don't want to play an aggressive move like 2. Ke2, so I will often play 1.a4 instead.
a4 is like telling ur opponent "I gave up already"
Dude get a BMW
I generally prefer e4 because I like open games. However, I occasionally play a4 when I'm playing for a draw. What are other people's thoughts?
Are you mad.The objective in the opening is to control and centre and not give it just like that to the opponent.a4 is a move wasted.
But isn't controlling the flanks just as important? It's just like in soccer - some teams like to organize their attacks through the middle, other like to attack from the two flanks.
No in openings the king is in the centre so it is better to has a tight grip in the centre. The flanks come in the middle game.
Who is pdela?
by kingofshedinjas a few minutes ago
Sicilian - Gran prix attack
by erik42085 a few minutes ago
by dibinjohn a few minutes ago
Official Staunton's Piatigorsky Set--A Great Reproduction of an Historic Set
by goodknightmike 2 minutes ago
Using Red Pieces in Tournament Games. Your Opinion? Post Your Red Set Pictures
by cgrau 2 minutes ago
by dibinjohn 3 minutes ago
5/30/2016 - Tarjan - Karpov, 1976
by vitff 5 minutes ago
Blitz battle recording
by weeverrm 6 minutes ago
Another OTB game lost on time to a player rated 400+ points more than me
by Inexorable88 10 minutes ago
We need more amateurs to post their annotated games.
by mrklin 13 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!