12929 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
What are the guidelines to know and to study on creating your own opening repertoire on chess?
I only got few and also the basic ones such as:
* Typical Pawn Structure that will Arise
* Endgame Strategy for both sides.
Please suggest for more guidelines and basic fundamentals! :D
While I think going over old master games of your system can be good.
I don't even study lines if I get a playable position with normal developing moves. I usually do some rough categorization like the following:
Is it an advanced line/exchange or regular? Broad centre or small? Gambit?
Where are the players castling?
Is any alternative development/early attack dangerous?
It can help to have some miniatures as well. Perfect games don't show the typical mistakes people make.
Depending on the complexity of the opening, I'm going to use a minimum of 3 main ideas. If it needs to be more concrete than that, I also look at more specific lines. I would play the Spanish any time, but you don't just play the Rauzer or the Sozin on the fly.
That is really all I do, since most people are out of book before move 15 and I don't get very much out of it most of the time. I just like to be developed while I have some idea for the middle game plan. The only thing I dislike is being really passive or downright clueless.
Most important for me is: Testing it. Obvious moves are often far more annoying than book lines. I often end up with a whole shadow tree or ''normal people's theory.'' This is almost never played by strong players, nor is it covered in learning books. If I just know how to survive this I am fine. I also learn a lot from the position like this.
You should choose according to what are you playing for. If you are playing for a win, you'll need lines which lead to a position where you stand better than the opponent. If you want a draw, there are other openings that will allow you to draw more easily no matter that you don't come up with such an advantage first. Sometimes you may play an opening that's not sound but requires an exact refutation, and if you're more familiar with it than your opponent you'll either get a better position or get more time (if your opponent is searching for a refutation over the board). Have a look at the known openings (and mainly at the positions which occur after them), choose which of them you want to use, then study them in detail and you should be fine.
This video should be very helpful, and it is free.
Better online bullet wins archive.
by aina0 2 minutes ago
Saw this today...
by Senior-Lazarus_Long 6 minutes ago
Solid opening for 1. E4 e5 as white? (With minimal theory, including sidelines)
by Username333 9 minutes ago
Post Your Vintage Chess Clocks Here
by Schachmonkey 12 minutes ago
by weggman 13 minutes ago
if you are playing live blitz
by starfishSurprise 19 minutes ago
2/6/2016 - Pawn Attack
by silvia_trench 24 minutes ago
i bet people with membership have lower ratings than people who don't
by lolurspammed 29 minutes ago
I have a question
by Cubetacular 43 minutes ago
Funny Chess Jokes
by silvia_trench 49 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!