Jobava-Prie Attack

my137thaccount
ECOA46 wrote:

Yeah but is good game maybe I can 0-0-0

The opportunity to castle queenside doens't make an opening good. OK it looks exciting, especially on online boards where castling is animated, but that doesn't make it good happy.png

ECOA46

Look at this game. I play on a real tournament the last Saturday.  I am playing with White pieces.

Milford Chess Tournament Quads 3 

Wilfredo Malave USCF:1209 vs Harold Miller 1573 EC0 A41

1.d4 d6 2.Nf3 Nd7 3.c3 b6 4.Bf4 Bb7 5.Nbd2 Ngf6 6.e3 h6 7.h3 Ne4 8.Bd3 Nxd2 9.Qxd2 Bxf3 10.gxf3 e5 11.Bg3 Be7 12.0-0-0 0-0 13.h4 exd4 14.exd4 Nf6 15.Kb1 d5 16.Rhg1 Nh5 17.Bf4 Nxf4 18.Qxf4 Qd6 19.Rxg7+ Kxg7 20.Rg1+ Kh8 21.Qf5 Qg6 22.Rxg6 Rg8 23.Rxh6+ Kg7 24.Rh7 Kf8 25.Qxf7# 1-0 

my137thaccount
ECOA46 wrote:

Look at this game. I play on a real tournament the last Saturday.  I am playing with White pieces.

Milford Chess Tournament Quads 3 

Wilfredo Malave USCF:1209 vs Harold Miller 1573 EC0 A41

1.d4 d6 2.Nf3 Nd7 3.c3 b6 4.Bf4 Bb7 5.Nbd2 Ngf6 6.e3 h6 7.h3 Ne4 8.Bd3 Nxd2 9.Qxd2 Bxf3 10.gxf3 e5 11.Bg3 Be7 12.0-0-0 0-0 13.h4 exd4 14.exd4 Nf6 15.Kb1 d5 16.Rhg1 Nh5 17.Bf4 Nxf4 18.Qxf4 Qd6 19.Rxg7+ Kxg7 20.Rg1+ Kh8 21.Qf5 Qg6 22.Rxg6 Rg8 23.Rxh6+ Kg7 24.Rh7 Kf8 25.Qxf7# 1-0 


Overall a nice game, but it doesn't mean castling queenside is always helpful. Note that in this game you had good central control, while in the dubious line you're suggesting you give black control of the centre.

ECOA46

But I win this game

my137thaccount
ECOA46 wrote:

But I win this game

Yes I know you won, and as I said it was a decent game. However, the fact that you won this game doesn't mean that 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nc3 d5 3.Bf4 c5 4.Nb5? is good. I simply annotated the game you played with a couple of obvious errors I noticed, but it was nonetheless a well played game for you, especially as you didn't make any blunders.

poucin

ECO please.

U give Nb5-Nc3.

What white achieved? Just wasting time.

No need to continue analysis and be stubborn.

If u want to play Nb5, e3 first then Nb5 is possible (because Nb5 protected by Bf1, white could answer c3 to Qa5).

 

rychessmaster1
IMBacon wrote:

White has given up the lead in development.

Moves the knight twice, unnecessarily, for an attack that never existed.

5.a3 accomplishes nothing.

6.Nc3 blocks the c-pawn, preventing the c4 pawn break, unless white moves the knight again for the third time.

Why not 6...Qb6

It might just be me, but i do not see what white gains from all of this?

 

Bolded part is wrong, rest I agree with.