21331 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Ok, so is the powerball lottery, lets see you win it...chess has far more variables than that. Don't give yourself so much credit, my cage is harder to rattle than you think.
The last part of your statement gives relevance to the statement I made in an earlier post about it not mattering if computers are able to solve chess, even the best grandmasters can't remember all of the variations.
...hit a nerve, did I?
Hey guys, I am not trying to kill chess...all I am saying is exactly what I said: FINITE.
Chess is not this mystical, unfathomable phenomenom like gravity or string-theory physics...it is a GAME.
An aquaintance of mine started playing this anti-theoretical opening 1. b4 and toured the country winning 100% in simultanious matches sometimes. Why? Is it because 1. b4 is the best move? Of course not. He won because he was a GRAND MASTER.
Yes, I agree. Chess has very many FINITE variables....and I am saddended to learn about the cage situation. I hope you are released soon into the daylight of understanding.
It should be noted that the top-rated player in the world got there without using computers very much, and his affiliation with Kasparov ended essentially because of his refusal to embrace Gazza's computer-oriented approach, and the weakest part of his game is generally considered to be his opening prep.
On the whole stronger players like having postmortems because recongise both sides learn and get better in the process. Weaker players are keener about hiding information, especially about openings, for competive reasons. The funny part is quite often they don't have anything worth keeping secret.
In the hole, after the game, all of the pieces go back in the box.
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by DavidPeters2 a few minutes ago
by donandminnie a few minutes ago
Torneo per Italiani.
by lentoscacchi 3 minutes ago
The OFFICIAL Don't Boycott The Daily Puzzle Thread.
by Diakonia 4 minutes ago
Tournament kid player cheating what should I do?
by Jenium 5 minutes ago
at what point is style not a factor in someone's play?
by RCMorea 5 minutes ago
5/6/2016 - Nezhmetdinov - Ermolin, Kazan 1946
by blujay88 5 minutes ago
Hurt/Heal World Champions
by hamerkop 5 minutes ago
Are the chess.com staff biased against MSC?
by Don_frye1 7 minutes ago
5/5/2016 - Simul Brilliancy
by iusegambits 7 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!