Sicillian Refutation?!?!

RussellWestbr00k

Also i started this thread hundreds of rating pts ago

 

madscientist2969

How to neutralize:

 

nighteyes1234
madscientist2969 wrote:

How to neutralize:

 

So the other side is "neutralized" when it has a +.5 advantage? That makes openings really easy to study.

kj63

7.Be2 and then Nc3?

RussellWestbr00k

WHY IS NO ONE CHALLENGING ME I CAN WIN

 

Taulmaril
RussellWestbr00k wrote:

WHY IS NO ONE CHALLENGING ME I CAN WIN

 

 

Challenge accepted.

gad610

Nice

santiagomagno15

Yes, I am sure all players that play sicilian including GMs are wrong, they dont know about this amazing refutation, dont reveal your secrets wink.png

RussellWestbr00k
santiagomagno15 wrote:

Yes, I am sure all players that play sicilian including GMs are wrong, they dont know about this amazing refutation, dont reveal your secrets

I'm glad we're on the same page.

fishface2

Esserman actually covers this in his book. Larsen used to play it as Black, reversing the move order. Black gets a somewhat cramped but playable position.

SigersonLTD
Bullet_Lover wrote:

Best way to avoid smith morra gambit..

 

Fischer always said the best way to refute a gambit is to accept it, so, you might be wrong on this one....

RathminesRampager

What would you play after

  1. 1.e4 c5 2. d4 2.cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4. Nxc3 Nc6 5. Nf3 d6 6. Bc4  e6 7. O-O 7.Be7 8. Qe2 a6 9.Rd1 Bd7?
  2. This line is missing from Esserman's book.
Optimissed

<<The Smith-Morra IS the refutation to the sicillian. I will make some analysis boards and CREAM the sicillian.>>

Breedin idjit.

RussellWestbr00k
RathminesRampager wrote:

What would you play after

  1. 1.e4 c5 2. d4 2.cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4. Nxc3 Nc6 5. Nf3 d6 6. Bc4  e6 7. O-O 7.Be7 8. Qe2 a6 9.Rd1 Bd7?
  2. This line is missing from Esserman's book.

E5 with initiative

 

RussellWestbr00k

I am waiting for ze challenge

 

RussellWestbr00k
madscientist2969 wrote:

How to neutralize:

 

5. Nf3

 

pfren
RussellWestbr00k έγραψε:
RathminesRampager wrote:

What would you play after

  1. 1.e4 c5 2. d4 2.cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4. Nxc3 Nc6 5. Nf3 d6 6. Bc4  e6 7. O-O 7.Be7 8. Qe2 a6 9.Rd1 Bd7?
  2. This line is missing from Esserman's book.

E5 with initiative

 

10.e5?

You can't be serious.

ponz111
RussellWestbr00k wrote:
RathminesRampager wrote:

What would you play after

1.e4 c5 2. d4 2.cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4. Nxc3 Nc6 5. Nf3 d6 6. Bc4  e6 7. O-O 7.Be7 8. Qe2 a6 9.Rd1 Bd7? This line is missing from Esserman's book.

E5 with initiative

 

10. e5? is a very bad move. Undecided

ScootaChess

Didn't kopec already refute the sicilian

robbie_1969

Bwahahaha