smith-mora gambit


  • 5 years ago · Quote · #21

    chopwood

    Thanks IM pfren. You have filled the very hole in my analysis that I needed. I have long ago settled on the classical variation by Langrock's own analysis. It's still very tricky, and I think that against a good tactical player as white, a lesser defense by black will land the second player in terrible trouble. I'll take your advice in my next tournament game. Jack

  • 5 years ago · Quote · #23

    chopwood

    You are probably right, but Langrock is an FIDE master, so I have taken his book seriously. Your comments will help me- I have tried the Chicago Defense and other variations , but his analysis of the classical line sounds like Black's best shot, and your addition makes me feel confident that I can at least put up a good fight. Jack

  • 5 years ago · Quote · #24

    chessmaster102

    Jack have you ever heard of the finegold or the evans defense these defenses praticaly refuted if not actually did refute the morra.

  • 5 years ago · Quote · #25

    Morris_W3

  • 5 years ago · Quote · #26

    Morris_W3

    This is a position that occured in a recent game after 16....0-0-0.  The obvious threat is 17.  N-e7+ forking the rook on g8, but also the half open c file looks very promising as well.  This is indicative of some of the games I have played (yes, both of us are <1400 {a point that has been made quite clear} ) but the game in general featured very quick attacks and it was quite enjoyable. 

  • 5 years ago · Quote · #28

    Morris_W3

    I get that a lot of more experienced players would not accept the gambit by making some of the moves discussed instead of 2...cxd.  ( I have seen that only a few times ).  When my opponent plays (sometimes d6 or Nf6) my usual response is to simply push the pawns to e5 or d5.  It makes for more of a  subtle, quieter game.  Not my cup of tea.

  • 9 months ago · Quote · #29

    bleekveld

    I've been playing against the smith mora for a while now, allthough so far i seem to struggle a lot after i take his pawn on c3 at move 3. I hear people speak about free pawn, allthough for me it is'nt that clear how to defend against all the tactics. And so i'm asking if there is any theory available that succesfully defends the smith mora gambit after taking the pawn on c3. By succesfully i mean without white having missed any tactical shots. For me it seems that my best defense is to either give back a pawn and still white has the initiative or to never grab the pawn on c3 but play d5 instead and make use of the fact that his knight cant go to the c3 square. Offcourse i rather learn how to defend this free pawn up.

  • 9 months ago · Quote · #31

    Dark_MagicianX

    Morra Gambit is totally sound. I not only play it over the board but also online and get extremly good results with it. White gets plenty of comp for just the pawn and there are many tactics in his fsavour. Also there are multiple lines that black simply cant play!

    My best game in the smith-morra:

     




Back to Top

Post your reply: