22937 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I've recently taken up the stonewall dutch as a main defense due to all the annoying KID lines (nobody wants to play 6.be2 with white in the king's indian anymore where I live and the Saemisch / Fianchetto systems are just annoying to me). I do pretty well with the dutch defense and was going to try playing it with white. What is a sound way to reach this structure with white after say 1.d4 1..nf6? 2.e3 or 2.f4? I'm new to 1.d4 stuff from the white side. Any feedback is highly appreciated.
It's not very good for White, especially if Black has not committed to d7-d5 (partly because they can play d6 after which your control over e5 is useless). Rather than trying to play the same setup as both colors, you would likely benefit from learning to play multiple different types of positions. Try different openings and see how you like them!
Thanks for the advice. I'm normally a 1.e4 guy but the stonewall is just so easy to play I wanted to ask about it from white's point of view. Thanks again.
If you REALLY want to play it with both colour you could build a repertoire where you play the stonewall after 1..d5 and against 1..nf6 you could play some mainline, or maybe the trompowsky or torre. Though you may run into some move order issues. 1.d4 e6 2.e3 nf6 and now torre lines arnt available, but if youre willing to play the QID/nimzo e3 lines then it should be ok after 3.c4, you could maybe even wait another move with 3.nf3.
The kingside fianchetto lines (KID stuff, e.g.) are what really put strong players off the Stonewall attack.
If you're keen to give it a try, Google up Yaacov Norowitz, who plays the SA via a 1.d4 2.e3 move order. If an opponent heads up KID lines, he transposes to a Colle-Zukertortish line, except with the bishop on e2. I don't find the lines convincing, but he makes some positional arguments for them and has been fairly successful with the approach.
Alternatively, you could play via a 1.f4 move order, and play the Stonewall if your opponent cooperates. Against fianchetto stuff you could play the mainline Classical Bird, which isn't critical, but isn't exactly bad.
Thanks for the advice everyone. I am kind of a minimalist as far as chessplaying goes and try to keep the same structures with both colors when possible. Now I know some options!
Tired of sandbagging players
by weakatbullet a few minutes ago
Chess need an extra piece!
by macer75 3 minutes ago
Thoughts on people who illegally download chess books?
by FrederickClegg 3 minutes ago
HUMORISTIC FUNNY CHESS PICS, IMAGES, CARICATURES, ETC...
by MACRINUS 4 minutes ago
Crying of resigning
by macer75 5 minutes ago
How to win Chess 960
by macer75 6 minutes ago
10/20/2016 - Untouchable
by juboraj 7 minutes ago
Can you checkmate this in 20 secs?
by n9531l 8 minutes ago
Who "decides" which opening to use?
by Morphysrevenges 10 minutes ago
Of course you owe a rematch
by Bobbarooski 23 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!