22661 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Youve got me wrong...iam not talking about top level, iam talking about club level...
The Englund and other unsound openings arent working versus against GM´s or IM´s, but most of us never face such opponents, most of us are playing against other patzers, like we all are ;-)
QGD on club level is mostly a boring positional game, were it is a question of time, when one of the opponents makes the first bad moves...many times its ending in a dry endgame and thats not the style of chess i prefer.
But everyone can play his favorite style...
For attacking players on middle club level the sidelines of the Englund are a very good choice, if you familiar with the opening and the middlegame plans.
Why not an Albin or a Schara Gambit? Sharp, dynamic gambits against d4 that actually have a few champions and advocates above a 2400 level? What is the advantage of playing Englund sidelines vs those?
the Albin and the Schara-Hennig-Gambit are also great options...i never said that you can or should only play the Englund, its a thread about the Blackburne-Hartlaub, thats why i didnt mentioned both gambits.
Personally i also play the Albin and also the Baltic Defence (1.d4 d5 2.c4 Bf5).
On middle club level most people handle the Baltic like a Queens Gambit and dont take on d5 in the second move and finally you have a QGD on the board with a developed queenside bishop outside the pawn structure d5, e6, c6...
There are many sharp alternatives beside the fashion standard openings.
You could cherry pick exciting games from any opening but I don't think it's unreasonable at all to say that some openings are more likely to result in sharp, exciting play than others. There are mainlines that can do that--I find great pleasure in watching professional Dragon and Najdorf games. But facing d4 with Black, there does tend to be a tradeoff where the more aggressively you fight against it, the more flawed your opening tends to be structurally.
My post was kind of tounge-in-cheek. Yeah, of course some gambit (or the KID, Benoni, etc.) is more likely to lead to sharp play, but that
a) doesn't mean QGD hanging pawn positions (for instance) aren't interesting (exactly the opposite, IMO)
b) traditionally quieter stuff can't turn crazy (as evidenced above)
Was I rude?
by iswarprasaddeuri a few minutes ago
Beating an arch-opponent in a cool opening
by solskytz 5 minutes ago
by DaniilZelenchuk 10 minutes ago
What do you say when people ask how good at chess you are ?
by Diakonia 12 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by RetiFan 13 minutes ago
I play a lot, but I'm not improving. What am I doing wrong?
by notmtwain 16 minutes ago
HUMORISTIC FUNNY CHESS PICS, IMAGES, CARICATURES, ETC...
by egoole 18 minutes ago
by AaronGo 19 minutes ago
by DeadlockedDestroyer 21 minutes ago
removal of harmless forum topics
by egoole 27 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!