17003 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This is a little known opening called the Chicago Gambit, which I have analysed a lot recently. What do you think? Please post comments/questions.:
That seems like a fun opening to mess around with. Granted, I have to scrimmage with it first to see if I should devote any time to it, but it looks rather interresting.
Why do people search for gimmicks to win games instead of relying on good old-fashioned hard work (playing decent lines)? This opening is a joke, and White will lose if Black plays properly. At least in other gambits, such as the Morra gambit in the Sicilian, White still has an even game if Black plays correctly. Giving up an entire piece without justification is just plain silly. (BTW, how can White be ahead in development in this gambit when the only piece he moved has been captured?)
I did not say that after those moves, that White had a lead in development. I said that in many of the lines I analysed, White gets a lead in development.
Fisher is right!!! The is a joke! sac a knight for a pawn just to have two pawns in the center. You're not leading in development, so the sac doen't make sense. Beside, The only advantages is you have two pawn in the center...
Why did you name this crazy gamit Chicago Gamit? heheheh
PLEASE change the name. I live in Chicago and I don't want anyone to think that Chi-town chess players plays such opening.
I have an idea. rename it Michigan Gambit
I don't think he's claiming to have invented it or naming it matz. It's called the Chicago gambit because a guy managed to beat Pillsbury with it in a tournament in Chicago. I can only think Pillsbury had drunk more Guinness than me on St. Patrick's day. Fun for blitz as someone said but not for longer games. Chesslover I'd be happy to have a game against you with it if you fancy it.
"a gambit is to sac a pawn to gain time space or open lines etc, but to sac a piece after 2 moves is simply suicide, and most half decent players would rejoice if their opponent played it . I suggest you rename it the hari kari !"
Hmmm . . . . . then would you call sacking 2 pieces in the opening hari hari kari kari?
Why do people search for gimmicks to win games instead of relying on good old-fashioned hard work (playing decent lines)?
I don't understand how a perfectly legitimate move can be considered a gimmick. I'll agree with the assertions of much better players than me that it is theoretically unsound, but a move like this can take people out of their comfort zone i.e. opening lines played a million times. IMHO - that's no bad thing.
That is the highly complex and theoretical Muzio Gambit. Those are fun and almost sound piece sacrifices while White loses a piece for virtually nothing in the Chicago Gambit
chess.com +2000 tactics seems easier for me!
by AIM-AceMove a few minutes ago
How to choose my color in Blitz
by Pulpofeira 3 minutes ago
opening with 1. a4 or 1. h4?
by C-Crusher 3 minutes ago
7/24/2016 - Attack And Defense
by Igrok777 3 minutes ago
win against higher rated opponent
by ChessOath 5 minutes ago
The Hardest Puzzle Ever Composed
by n9531l 8 minutes ago
why does no one care about the champions after Kasparov?
by DrSpudnik 18 minutes ago
Report Spam here! Spam Only! Not abuse, not cheating, Spam Only!
by watershoot 20 minutes ago
How to improve this weakness?
by ChessOfPlayer 24 minutes ago
kingdom of grandmasters
by slowdeath22 25 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!