19231 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
If you think opening knowledge is the only thing stopping you from beating a GM, you could easily beat any lower-rated Club player even a piece down. Your online rating is such that you would play people far worse than low-rated Club. The worst thing that those missing 'rarer sidelines' could POSSIBLY cost you is being down a whole piece.Ergo, if your knowledge of chess *removing the opening (and move-order) completely from the equation* was even Expert level - again, you claim it to be GM level- you'd easily be 1600 rated in Online Chess.
I am 1700+ on ChessCube. That's where I play chess.
My all time high is 1825, but I have beat 2000+ and 2200+ rated players.
And it's well-known that chesscube ratings aren't inflated the slightest.
Have you been on the site?
I have played on both Chess.com and Chesscube.
The rating difference is only very slight.
For the sake of science, I created tonight an account on chesscube, under the name Irontiger_che (Irontiger was already registered but it is not me).
After 20 games (16W / 3L / 1D), I reached a 1871 rating, which is about as high as I ever got on chess.com. Add to this the fact that I am tired, not used to the interface (I got two of my losses immediately after subscribing), I expect to reach a safe 2000 if I continue, which is a difference of rating of 250 points.
So much for the "slight" difference in ratings.
It depends on the players. Some 1800's play very well.
And some play like crap. Avoid the blitz players.
By playing chess, probably?
Your analysis snippet is plain ridiculous.
9...b5? allows the natural 10.e5, when Black stands as good as lost.
You are funny.
Damn, you got there first.
by Tony_Tango a few minutes ago
by Martin_Stahl 2 minutes ago
2/10/2016 - Gregoriev, 1925
by MiCrooks 3 minutes ago
8/3/2014 - Mate in 2
by SonOfThunder2 10 minutes ago
The Backyard Professor
by Ziryab 12 minutes ago
Is the Suicide Sacrifice definition similar to ....
by Facebook 13 minutes ago
Sudden Rating Increase
by baddogno 13 minutes ago
by richie_and_oprah 14 minutes ago
2/9/2016 - Tempo Time
by n9531l 18 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by AlanDewey 22 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!