Forums

The Closed Sicilian: The Dangerous Pawn Push

Sort:
Yereslov

So, how can black get a decent position out of this?

Yereslov
pfren wrote:

By playing chess, probably?

Your analysis snippet is plain ridiculous.

9...b5? allows the natural 10.e5, when Black stands as good as lost.

I am aware. I only meant to get to the typical Closed Sicilian position. I could have chosen any move order.

After all, the thread is about the pawn push, not the game itself.

Anyways, what's your take on it? Give me some feedback, instead of just criticizing 9...b5?

Yereslov
pfren wrote:

By playing chess, probably?

Your analysis snippet is plain ridiculous.

9...b5? allows the natural 10.e5, when Black stands as good as lost.

Nonetheless, the entire combination is sound after 12. f5!?.

By the way, I checked 10. e5! with Houdini and Rybka. Black can manage a draw with accurate play, so it's not completely losing.

Three pieces vs. two (still a draw):

yourChess
Yereslov
yourChess wrote:
 

2. Nxh7! is better, since black has to respond to the discovered check.

steve_bute

Continuing to analyze a line after a blunder (9...b5) is a waste of time.

Yereslov
steve_bute wrote:

Continuing to analyze a line after a blunder (9...b5) is a waste of time.

You miss the point.

The blunder doesn't matter. What matters is the pawn push.

The blunder is also not losing.

steve_bute
Yereslov wrote:
steve_bute wrote:

Continuing to analyze a line after a blunder (9...b5) is a waste of time.

You miss the point.

The blunder doesn't matter. What matters is the pawn push.

The blunder is also not losing.

This is like saying "Yes, I know I've cut my femoral artery, but look how nicely I've bandaged this nick on my finger."

Yereslov
steve_bute wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
steve_bute wrote:

Continuing to analyze a line after a blunder (9...b5) is a waste of time.

You miss the point.

The blunder doesn't matter. What matters is the pawn push.

The blunder is also not losing.

This is like saying "Yes, I know I've cut my femoral artery, but look how nicely I've bandaged this nick on my finger."

The point behind the thread is to find a good reply to f5.

The moves played were just played to reach that position. It has nothing to do with the discussion.

steve_bute
Yereslov wrote:
steve_bute wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
steve_bute wrote:

Continuing to analyze a line after a blunder (9...b5) is a waste of time.

You miss the point.

The blunder doesn't matter. What matters is the pawn push.

The blunder is also not losing.

This is like saying "Yes, I know I've cut my femoral artery, but look how nicely I've bandaged this nick on my finger."

The point behind the thread is to find a good reply to f5.

The moves played were just played to reach that position. It has nothing to do with the discussion.

Consider posing a sequence of moves that reaches your position of interest without Black losing a piece. To most of us, post-blunder analysis is not a productive activity.

bean_Fischer

This is completely losing game for Black! I will never play any Sicilian anymore. Time to pack.

Yereslov
bean_Fischer wrote:

This is completely losing game for Black! I will never play any Sicilian anymore. Time to pack.

How is it losing, wise one?

bean_Fischer
Yereslov wrote:
bean_Fischer wrote:

This is completely losing game for Black! I will never play any Sicilian anymore. Time to pack.

How is it losing, wise one?

Trapped. You don't get it. The joke is on you. lol.

Yereslov
bean_Fischer wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
bean_Fischer wrote:

This is completely losing game for Black! I will never play any Sicilian anymore. Time to pack.

How is it losing, wise one?

Trapped. You don't get it. The joke is on you. lol.

The joke isn't on me. Play the position out and you will see that black has many resources to even out the game.

Yereslov

This thread is about f5. Focus on f5, and stop trolling.

bean_Fischer
Yereslov wrote:

This thread is about f5. Focus on f5, and stop trolling.

Relax. I like it when my opponents play closed Sicilian. It shows that they are afraid to play true Sicilian. As a positional player, I certainly hope they play closed Sicilian.

And what is the point of playing 1. e4, if they are afraid of Sicilian, the most played defense? They should change to something else.

bean_Fischer

When you play 1.e4, you should certainly expect that your opponent will answer 1. ... c5. So face it, instead of lloking for a closed Sicilian.

steve_bute
bean_Fischer wrote:

When you play 1.e4, you should certainly expect that your opponent will answer 1. ... c5. So face it, instead of lloking for a closed Sicilian.

Some of us like the Closed Sicilian because opponents who have weak positional play have trouble figuring it out.

bean_Fischer

logic and move order matter.  Those are the things that need special attention.

Ayman_Jarjour
pfren wrote:
Yereslov wrote:
I am aware. I only meant to get to the typical Closed Sicilian position. I could have chosen any move order.

After all, the thread is about the pawn push, not the game itself.

Anyways, what's your take on it? Give me some feedback, instead of just criticizing 9...b5?

So, how Black should respond to 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 g6 3.Qh5 Bg7 4.Qxc5?

According to your errrm... logic, move order does not matter, nor missing 3...gh5 does.

Why don't you quit chess for something you can possibly understand? (although I can't really suggest anything).

Gads. Grown men with big bushy beards and titles like "international master" being mean to each other over a board game. 

Why don't we all grow up and get out of the house a little more, try and figure out what's important in life...