What do you think of this opening variation??

hahahahaha, I mean the idea of the bishop attacking the queen, that part.

He edited his post. Changed the diagram entirely post~#1 and has made nonsense of his own thread.

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6

Is what was originally shown.

Certainly not the Ruy Lopez, which is characterised by 3.Bb5. (EDIT : in the current diagram, showing 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d3 (?) b6 (?) 4.Bg5)

I don't know the name of 3.d3, but it certainly isn't a very good opening. 3...b6 looks dubious too, in this move order.

He edited it @ Irontiger.

Look at the responses/comments.

Was: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 

originally.  Which is of course the Ruy Lopez :)

Yes, I did edit it, I knew that what wasn't in the brackets was the Ruy Lopez, I wanted to know what the opening in the brackets was. Everyone said ruy lopez, so I got rid of what I didn't want recognised, and just made it the brackets stuff.

I see.

said the blind man

Just looks like a crappy side variation of a reversed Philidor, which itself is at least fairly crappy even when well played, e.g., with Be2 instead of Bg5.

What do u think of this opening or defense variations ?

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=648028475

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=647142848

In post #22, 1.e4 c6 2.d3 d5 3.Nf3 de4 4.Nfd2?? loses a central pawn, undevelops a piece, and gives Black a decisive edge. That opening is a bust.

Is that a Bust Opening ? Okay, check out all the links below:
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=644781306
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=645035000
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=645143504

Now, for for example, checkout game editor below :

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=646099207