Why the Owen's defence is bad

topj
MasterOfNinjas

How are you proving the Owen's Defence is bad?

Or is this humilation towards Richard?

topj
[COMMENT DELETED]
topj

he goes around saying it's the best opening ever 

MasterOfNinjas

But why are you humilating it in public?

What good is it doing?

topj

he told me to actually

MasterOfNinjas

seriously?

That's not what I see in your forum

why the london is rubbish against the King's Indian.

 

In fact I see it says DONT PUT the game.

You're not using it for a good purpose but humilation!

MasterOfNinjas

"Rookrager

Don't you dare put our game into that forum jake, i let you win on purpose and u will just humiliate me."

I copied this from the forum. i see that as a completely different response.

eleanor-the-great
Sungolian wrote:

yup looks pretty bad to me!

DON'T ENCOURAGE IT!

AlucardII
sillytigger wrote:

"Rookrager

Don't you dare put our game into that forum jake, i let you win on purpose and u will just humiliate me."

I copied this from the forum. i see that as a completely different response.

To me, that's a fairly negative statement. DON'T you dare... so unless you two are good mates and you can judge when he's saying "don't do this" and when he's joking around, I'd say your post is simply a d*ck move.

Anyways, how is one gme an example of why the Owens is a bad defence? I don't think it's great, by any means, but if you want to refute it you're going to have to do a lot more work than simply posting one game, devoid of sideline annotations. Where's your analysis?

topj

i know but u have to counter-attack(Q-side) and if u don't u are in alot of trouble

topj

that's my point

eleanor-the-great
AlucardII wrote:
sillytigger wrote:

"Rookrager

Don't you dare put our game into that forum jake, i let you win on purpose and u will just humiliate me."

I copied this from the forum. i see that as a completely different response.

To me, that's a fairly negative statement. DON'T you dare... so unless you two are good mates and you can judge when he's saying "don't do this" and when he's joking around, I'd say your post is simply a d*ck move.

Anyways, how is one gme an example of why the Owens is a bad defence? I don't think it's great, by any means, but if you want to refute it you're going to have to do a lot more work than simply posting one game, devoid of sideline annotations. Where's your analysis?

Yes we are good mates...that sums that up!

MasterOfNinjas

Yes but Jake, I see no analysis and as you admitted, you are just doing this for humilation.

At least there should be some analysis.

And 1 game doesnt mean its bad

Sith_Nazgul
[COMMENT DELETED]
Sith_Nazgul
[COMMENT DELETED]
Sith_Nazgul

By the way it says 0-1

MasterOfNinjas

We didn't say it was bad.

We're stating:

 

WE WANT PROOF TO SHOW THE OWEN'S DEFENCE IS BAD.

 

Otherwise, no proof means its a good opening.

eleanor-the-great
Rookrager wrote:

By the way it says 0-1

lol

 

Guys I really don't like this arguing between us... it's not nice.

Jake you have no proof that the owen defence is bad with just one game.

Richard there is no need to put up a forum post saying why not to play the King's Indian.

 

Please STOP THIS NOW!

MasterOfNinjas

Hmmmm I absolutely agree with Eleanor.

 

U 2.

STOP BEING SO INSENSITIVE.

There.

Stop it.