13901 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
How are you proving the Owen's Defence is bad?
Or is this humilation towards Richard?
he goes around saying it's the best opening ever
But why are you humilating it in public?
What good is it doing?
he told me to actually
That's not what I see in your forum
why the london is rubbish against the King's Indian.
In fact I see it says DONT PUT the game.
You're not using it for a good purpose but humilation!
Don't you dare put our game into that forum jake, i let you win on purpose and u will just humiliate me."
I copied this from the forum. i see that as a completely different response.
yup looks pretty bad to me!
DON'T ENCOURAGE IT!
To me, that's a fairly negative statement. DON'T you dare... so unless you two are good mates and you can judge when he's saying "don't do this" and when he's joking around, I'd say your post is simply a d*ck move.
Anyways, how is one gme an example of why the Owens is a bad defence? I don't think it's great, by any means, but if you want to refute it you're going to have to do a lot more work than simply posting one game, devoid of sideline annotations. Where's your analysis?
i know but u have to counter-attack(Q-side) and if u don't u are in alot of trouble
that's my point
Yes we are good mates...that sums that up!
Yes but Jake, I see no analysis and as you admitted, you are just doing this for humilation.
At least there should be some analysis.
And 1 game doesnt mean its bad
By the way it says 0-1
We didn't say it was bad.
WE WANT PROOF TO SHOW THE OWEN'S DEFENCE IS BAD.
Otherwise, no proof means its a good opening.
Guys I really don't like this arguing between us... it's not nice.
Jake you have no proof that the owen defence is bad with just one game.
Richard there is no need to put up a forum post saying why not to play the King's Indian.
Please STOP THIS NOW!
Hmmmm I absolutely agree with Eleanor.
STOP BEING SO INSENSITIVE.
8/25/2016 - Around The Way
by bans_amit a few minutes ago
OTB – Edinburgh 2016 Congress 8-10th April
by kaynight a few minutes ago
Plans and ideas in the Najdorf Sicilian
by sreebaia 3 minutes ago
KID with 1...e5 against the English
by Gramsci21 4 minutes ago
If You Could Go to Dinner with Any Chess Player, Who'd You Pick?
by ChessPlayinDude47 13 minutes ago
How to improve memorization
by GeronimoGM 16 minutes ago
chess.com is full [Edited for language - Mod]
by kaynight 35 minutes ago
1.e4 gambits for white
by arunsir789789 38 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by Elubas 39 minutes ago
my name is aravindh
by fuzzbug 62 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!