19947 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Why would a set of rules specify what is allowed?
The problem with this thread is that Polar_Bear accuses many players of "cheating" and when they respond to this--they are declared "off subject".
To be honest...i despise the idea that centaurism is the Future. But i certainly do not dismiss players who practice it in the meantime. I sincerely believe some of those individuals who have posted here, contrary to your (the OP's) ideology, that centaurizing is just an means to stay competitive in Today's Correspondence Chess format. Because there was a time when, not so long ago, this format (CC or Postal) wasn't even considered as an true form of Chess-rather instead, an Casual variant (like Blitz).
These days, it has become very relevant, more so if not less than playing Blitz games. That being said, however, i do agree that certain major CC organizations should just, henceforth, put aside their sentimentality and simply add another "C" (for Centaur) into their acronyms.
(It would, in my opinion, eliminate many concerns that several CC Purists have ie Viability of True CC Champions, Accomplishments, Descrempancies of Ethics etc)
Because, obviously, some CC players lack either common sense or sense for fair play. It should go without saying players shall decide moves themselves without help of other players, even the ICCF mentions that (and let's accept that engines are kind of players too, not mere tools, as obvious and axiomatic).
It happened in the pre-computer era too, but it used to be marginal issue, because strong continuous (human) assistance was quite unusual. It couldn't be statistically proven then, because there weren't numeric evaluations of moves available. It could be ignored then, but today computer's assistance is easily available, strong and continuous. Fortunately, computers offer solution as anti-cheat analytical tools too.
Why "anti"? The ICCF is a well established group.
ICCF is just another online chess playserver, which usurps the rights to run online correspondence championships and proclaim correspondence chess champions. My points are:
1) ICCF doesn't prohibit and police computers, thus its "championships" are awful joke.
2) If ICCF playserver can host world championships, chess.com can too. There is no TM for correspondence world championship.
3) Chess.com is the biggest playserver, ICCF-web is pretty average. Apart from the dubious ICCF's computer approach, the world championship hosted here will be more valid, because of more members.
4) Lack of recognition by FIDE doesn't matter, because FIDE became untrustworthy itself under Kirsan Ilyumzhinov.
is this true? Because I am considering joining ICCF. If computer use is allowed, then I might reconsider.
Yes, ICCF allows engines.
ok. It is centaur chess then? Do you know if they have a section for non engine users?
1. Yes, it's centaur chess.
2. I don't know for sure if they have such a section, but I don't believe it.
Centaur chess is prohibited on chess.com
Centaur chess is prohibited on chess.com
More precisely: You may play unrated centaur games and tournaments, if agreed beforehand.
Before joining ICCF I should of done my homework. I though once you joined you can start playing, but you need to purchase a membership in the particular country where you reside.
What time do you of?
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by 0110001101101000 a few minutes ago
Isn't It Impossible to Compare Players From Different Eras?
by Lasker1900 2 minutes ago
The conspiracy against me
by RonaldJosephCote 2 minutes ago
Move 17 - 5 Piece Control
by williamn27 3 minutes ago
Grandmaster blunders both rooks but proves Caro-Kann is undefeatable!
by williamn27 7 minutes ago
Naka is NOT the best blitz player in the world
by AIM-AceMove 8 minutes ago
Vote for your favorite chess.com forum moderators...
by BlargDragon 9 minutes ago
Getting the old layout !
by Diakonia 12 minutes ago
1400 in blitz!
by williamn27 12 minutes ago
All The Reasons We Hate V3!
by Connor_Macleod1518 19 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!