14077 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Edit: Don't be fooled, this thread is from the previous WC cycle, Conflagration_Planet is just being an idiot by posting in this thread, knowing people will get the wrong impression. Just don't post here.
Personally, I say good on him. I don't agree with his idea that the top player shouldn't get seeded into the final (I quite like it as a title, rather than a tournament, with title defences), but I do agree with him that the world championship organisers need to shape up. I admire Carlsen for not being blinded by the desire for the title, and deciding to bow out of the cycle.
Good job Magnus Carlsen for standing up for his believes and not just focusing on the title although it is most sad that he can't participate in the WCC
I know this thread is getting old, but I've been thinking about this a lot and finally know what I want to say.
I totally agree with Carlsen that the FIDE cycle is stupid. But I also think the VERY LAST thing he should have picked on was the very old chess tradition of being required to take the crown from the reigning king. Someone pointed out that there are other mano y mano sports that have the same structure, like boxing.
Someone probably also pointed out that there are other mano y mano sports that do not have this structure, like tennis. But, unlike chess, the rules for breaking ties game-by-game and set-by-set have been part of the rules of tennis for more than a century.
So maybe what Carlsen wants is ultimately the fairest, but I still think there are many more obvious and less controversial problems with the cycle that could be settled first.
It sounds like Morphy - Staunton all over again.
Only Fischer was an actual world champion.
And dressed better
This will get peoples attention.
What's that [Expletive removed my moderator] emoticon? you post in a 2 years old topic only to troll. What a idiot
[Please watch your language and try to be a little more respectful]
What's that [removed] emoticon? you post in a 2 years old topic only to troll. What a idiot
It's not like he's hurting anybody. You don't need to get carried away.
If he necropost on a 2 years old post he is a idiot. I don't carry away, simply say that he is a idiot kid.
It did get your attention
I have been trolled.
It's three years old. Can't you count?
I was kind of thinking it was ridiculous that the server stores irrelevant information until it's the size of mt. Everest, little of which was chess related.
Some of it's good.
if you ever find it
digging out old threads!
London system scrubs
by luvsic02 9 minutes ago
7/24/2016 - Attack And Defense
by gavinw 12 minutes ago
The Hardest Puzzle Ever Composed
by Arisktotle 15 minutes ago
Grandmaster Repertoire 1A Boris Avrukh
by rohirrimelf 24 minutes ago
Checkmate in 50 moves (99 plies)
by gardenz 25 minutes ago
#BCM2 - Pulpofeira vs. MSC157
by MSC157 30 minutes ago
Alert + sound
by Catnap75 38 minutes ago
Chess in Arab world
by kaynight 44 minutes ago
Why my premium subscription has been cancelled...?
by Korle 59 minutes ago
draws are nice
by castleguy12 60 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!