Chess Player of the Month April 2012
I still believe it is an unfortunate, chimeric process: on the front end everyone is free to vote for 2-3 cycles, but at the end the winner is decided by past winners, MOST OF THEM ELECTED BY AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT PROCESS. So it is part general election, part selection of a Supreme Court. I would not call this democratic. One should not be deterred from true democracy due to the presence of lobbying. A vote is a vote.
this has got to be one of the most ridiculous threads I've ever been witness to ... I can't think of a close second.
this has got to be one of the most ridiculous threads I've ever been witness to ... I can't think of a close second.
Then you haven't looked at very many.
this has got to be one of the most ridiculous threads I've ever been witness to ... I can't think of a close second.
look pal, a few of us already had you sussed out, but now you're really doing yourself in.
this has got to be one of the most ridiculous threads I've ever been witness to ... I can't think of a close second.
What planet do you hail from? CPOTM is the premier training ground for posting in all the other "general discussion" threads. As a hot topic, it is only overshadowed (temporarily) by the thread "gg battle: a must read."
It's the closest thing to a perpetual motion machine so far developed on Chess.com, so post derogatory comments at your own risk. You have been warned.
this has got to be one of the most ridiculous threads I've ever been witness to ... I can't think of a close second.
Unbelievable. I think that comment is insubordination, or sedition, or something like that.
trysts, just a simple question ... what exactly is the degree of seriousness here?
come on dude
wait. who votes? (lulz)