13524 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I think that there's a key element you're on to that's nipped the lobbying in the bud but that a bunch of the rest is extraneous and confusing. Cut the fat from the lean and you've got a winner.
wait. who votes? (lulz)
I was not drinking but wish I was
Don't all of your opponents bring sherry?
So much for the voting picture I was going to use.
I still believe it is an unfortunate, chimeric process: on the front end everyone is free to vote for 2-3 cycles, but at the end the winner is decided by past winners, MOST OF THEM ELECTED BY AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT PROCESS. So it is part general election, part selection of a Supreme Court. I would not call this democratic. One should not be deterred from true democracy due to the presence of lobbying. A vote is a vote.
I really think I'm going to be a footnote in a term project.
It's now like a papal conclave
as it should be. most of you aren't smart enough to know.
this has got to be one of the most ridiculous threads I've ever been witness to ... I can't think of a close second.
Then you haven't looked at very many.
look pal, a few of us already had you sussed out, but now you're really doing yourself in.
What planet do you hail from? CPOTM is the premier training ground for posting in all the other "general discussion" threads. As a hot topic, it is only overshadowed (temporarily) by the thread "gg battle: a must read."
It's the closest thing to a perpetual motion machine so far developed on Chess.com, so post derogatory comments at your own risk. You have been warned.
(off to go check out gg battle and contemplate the meaning of life :)
Unbelievable. I think that comment is insubordination, or sedition, or something like that.
trysts, just a simple question ... what exactly is the degree of seriousness here?
come on dude
It's like a Master's degree in seriousness.
by AlCzervik 2 minutes ago
Post your game for expert analysis
by JimmyBrunoGtr 7 minutes ago
I need to take chess more seriously.
by JimmyBrunoGtr 15 minutes ago
KID with 1...e5 against the English
by Gramsci21 18 minutes ago
by DubiousDefeat 27 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by Elubas 28 minutes ago
All The Reasons We Hate V3!
by Connor_Macleod1518 28 minutes ago
What do you play against 1.e4?
by DubiousDefeat 29 minutes ago
Why do chess players wait for there time to run out?
by DubiousDefeat 35 minutes ago
8/26/2016 - Kouatly - Tsheshkovsky, Hoogovens 1988
by anandvelu1 39 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!