I think that there's a key element you're on to that's nipped the lobbying in the bud but that a bunch of the rest is extraneous and confusing. Cut the fat from the lean and you've got a winner.
wait. who votes? (lulz)
I was not drinking but wish I was
Don't all of your opponents bring sherry?
So much for the voting picture I was going to use.
I still believe it is an unfortunate, chimeric process: on the front end everyone is free to vote for 2-3 cycles, but at the end the winner is decided by past winners, MOST OF THEM ELECTED BY AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT PROCESS. So it is part general election, part selection of a Supreme Court. I would not call this democratic. One should not be deterred from true democracy due to the presence of lobbying. A vote is a vote.
I really think I'm going to be a footnote in a term project.
It's now like a papal conclave
as it should be. most of you aren't smart enough to know.
this has got to be one of the most ridiculous threads I've ever been witness to ... I can't think of a close second.
Then you haven't looked at very many.
look pal, a few of us already had you sussed out, but now you're really doing yourself in.
What planet do you hail from? CPOTM is the premier training ground for posting in all the other "general discussion" threads. As a hot topic, it is only overshadowed (temporarily) by the thread "gg battle: a must read."
It's the closest thing to a perpetual motion machine so far developed on Chess.com, so post derogatory comments at your own risk. You have been warned.
(off to go check out gg battle and contemplate the meaning of life :)
Unbelievable. I think that comment is insubordination, or sedition, or something like that.
trysts, just a simple question ... what exactly is the degree of seriousness here?
come on dude
It's like a Master's degree in seriousness.