bulldog chess with witch captaintugwash vs Rychessmaster1

rychessmaster1
captaintugwash wrote:

 Oh yeah, I did see the tactic a few days ago, but it's not so good for me. The idea was 15. c4, threatening to fork knight and bishop. Knight can retreat, but the bishop cannot and falls next move to 16. c5 and 17 b4. However, you have 15... Nxc4 and you get two pawns for the knight and open me up. It would be the opposite of comfortable. I saw this refutation when you played Qg8, and assumed that was the purpose of that move... tempting me into stabbing your pieces.

 

I think I need to recapture with the pawn here but I'm going to chill for the day, it's sunday and I'm baked.

Yes I was intending Nxc4 after c4

captaintugwash

17. dxe5

null

rychessmaster1
e6
captaintugwash

18. We4

null

rychessmaster1
Wf5
captaintugwash

 19. Qf1

null

rychessmaster1
I see that sneaky little threat of yours😏
Kc8
captaintugwash

20. g4

null

rychessmaster1

We7

captaintugwash

21. Qe1

null

 

rychessmaster1

Qg7