.. It would appear, that before the 'admin' here, addresses, your complaint ; It will definitely, require, many more, similar, misgivings ; Than, your one, isolated example !
Anyway ; The chances are, that, as time goes on ; You'll manage, to counter-balance that, in 'winning' a game{s} ;You should've lost ! -- Also, becoming, pre-occupied, with how 'high' your 'online-rating' is ; Versus, what, it could've been, in ideal circumstances ; Misses, the point ; In what this experience, is All about !
It's probably, Not all that different, than 'referees'; Collectively making, one or 2, 'blown calls'. - Normally, the 'cream' will 'rise' to-the-top ; Despite, such anomalies. o:
I just experienced a loss due to my allegedly Abandoning a game. The game is here:
https://www.chess.com/live#g=2389990600.
My next move was to be Bh4#. However I lost connection, (specifically, my computer restarted for reasons unknown). When this happened, I immediately went to another machine and logged into chess.com but it was too late: chess.com forced resignation. I was in a clearly winning position, and I had more time on the clock than my opponent.
It seems like the time limit for abandoned games is too tight. I understand that chess.com implements these policies to deal with game abandonment. Game abandonment is a rampant problem here. But it seems like the time threshold should be lengthened to allow someone who was disconnected to get back in. Another idea might be for chess.com to utilize its own computer analysis to determine the likelihood that the game was abandoned. If someone is in a winning position, they are less likely to abandon, I think...
Thoughts?